Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Juvenile courts--Minnesota (3)
- Minnesota (3)
- Drug courts (2)
- Veterans treatment courts (2)
- Administrative procedure (1)
-
- Burger Court (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Contempt law reform (1)
- Contempt power (1)
- Courthouse symbols (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Due process (1)
- Federal law (1)
- Federalist Papers (1)
- Full faith and credit (Federalism) (1)
- Housing (1)
- Housing courts (1)
- Judges--Minnesota (1)
- Judicial opinions (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Justice (1)
- Juvenile delinquents--Sentencing (1)
- Landlord and tenant (1)
- Legal Representation (1)
- Minnesota. Supreme Court (1)
- Poverty (1)
- Pro Bono (1)
- Pro Se (1)
- Probation violations (1)
- Race (1)
Articles 1 - 17 of 17
Full-Text Articles in Law
Contempt Power And The United States Courts, Joshua Carback
Contempt Power And The United States Courts, Joshua Carback
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
Contempt power is one of the most important legacies of English common law in federal common law. Substantively, the contempt power of the United States Courts is relatively similar to that employed by the Court of King’s Bench in the eighteenth century. Procedurally, however, it is quite different. The Rules Enabling Act of 1934 created an interbranch framework for crafting procedural rules for the United States Courts. All three branches of the federal government collaborated under that framework with the intention of rationalizing, systemizing, and delimiting the boundaries of contempt power. The culmination of decades of strenuous rulemaking, unfortunately, was …
Correction Of Monumental Judicial Malpractice: The Case For Clearing Secessionist And Slaveholding Symbols Of "Justice" From The Courthouse, Michael J. Pastrick Esq.
Correction Of Monumental Judicial Malpractice: The Case For Clearing Secessionist And Slaveholding Symbols Of "Justice" From The Courthouse, Michael J. Pastrick Esq.
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Served, Housing Preserved: The Ramsey County Housing Court Model, Colleen Ebinger, Elizabeth Clysdale
Justice Served, Housing Preserved: The Ramsey County Housing Court Model, Colleen Ebinger, Elizabeth Clysdale
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
State Courts And Democratic Theory: Toward A Theory Of State Constitutional Judicial Review, David Schultz
State Courts And Democratic Theory: Toward A Theory Of State Constitutional Judicial Review, David Schultz
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Structural Underpinnings Of Access To Justice: Building A Solid Pro Bono Infrastructure, Latonia Haney Keith
The Structural Underpinnings Of Access To Justice: Building A Solid Pro Bono Infrastructure, Latonia Haney Keith
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Neither Fish Nor Fowl: The Separation Of Powers And The Office Of Administrative Hearings, Ann E. Cohen, Elise Larson
Neither Fish Nor Fowl: The Separation Of Powers And The Office Of Administrative Hearings, Ann E. Cohen, Elise Larson
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Warren To Burger: Race Relations Inside The Court, Robert Fabrikant
From Warren To Burger: Race Relations Inside The Court, Robert Fabrikant
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Practitioner’S Guide To Due Process Issues In Veteranstreatment Courts, Evan C. Tsai
The Practitioner’S Guide To Due Process Issues In Veteranstreatment Courts, Evan C. Tsai
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Minnesota Stand Down Model: Bringing Stand Down Courtsto Rural Communities, Sara Sommarstrom
The Minnesota Stand Down Model: Bringing Stand Down Courtsto Rural Communities, Sara Sommarstrom
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transgressions Of A Timid Judiciary: Our Highest Court's Refusal To Overturn Abood V. Board Of Education—Harris V. Quinn, Joe E. Ling
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Rule Of Unanimity's Circuit Splitting Effect: The Problem With Consent—Griffioen V. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Co., Aaron P. Meland
The Rule Of Unanimity's Circuit Splitting Effect: The Problem With Consent—Griffioen V. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Co., Aaron P. Meland
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Does A "Juvenile Adjudication" Mean In Minnesota? Some New Answers After A Century Of Change In Juvenile Court, John M. Stuart, Amy K. R. Zaske
What Does A "Juvenile Adjudication" Mean In Minnesota? Some New Answers After A Century Of Change In Juvenile Court, John M. Stuart, Amy K. R. Zaske
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Celebrating 100 Years Of Juvenile Court In Minnesota, Paul H. Anderson
Foreword: Celebrating 100 Years Of Juvenile Court In Minnesota, Paul H. Anderson
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Minnesota Juvenile Courts: Principles Of Excellence For The Next 100 Years
Minnesota Juvenile Courts: Principles Of Excellence For The Next 100 Years
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Legacy Of Public Law 280: Comparing And Contrasting Minnesota’S New Rule For The Recognition Of Tribal Court Judgments With The Recent Arizona Rule, Kevin K. Washburn, Chloe Thompson
A Legacy Of Public Law 280: Comparing And Contrasting Minnesota’S New Rule For The Recognition Of Tribal Court Judgments With The Recent Arizona Rule, Kevin K. Washburn, Chloe Thompson
William Mitchell Law Review
Tribal court dockets across the country have been growing steadily, and tribal courts are becoming an important part of the judicial fabric of the United States. To acknowledge this reality, state courts and legislatures across the United States have begun to address the important issues of how and whether to recognize tribal court judgments in state courts. The Minnesota Supreme Court adopted a rule that took effect in January of 2004 that provides guidelines for the recognition and enforcement of tribal court orders and judgments. The Minnesota Supreme Court Rule on the Recognition and Enforcement of Tribal Court Orders and …
Foreword, Sam Hanson
Foreword, Sam Hanson
William Mitchell Law Review
Introduction to issue of Recent Decisions of the Minnesota Supreme Court (from 2002-03 term).
The Creativity Of The Common-Law Judge: The Jurisprudence Of William Mitchell, Charles J. Reid Jr.
The Creativity Of The Common-Law Judge: The Jurisprudence Of William Mitchell, Charles J. Reid Jr.
William Mitchell Law Review
Mitchell's presence graced the Minnesota Supreme Court for nearly nineteen years, from 1881 to 1900. His output was prodigious. He produced nearly 1600 judicial opinions. It has been estimated “that excluding Sundays, and allowing a month in each year for vacation, Judge Mitchell wrote one opinion in every three days for nineteen years.” Indeed, “[i]n point of numbers, his opinions exceed those of any other justice of the Supreme Court of his state, or the nation.” It is one aspect, perhaps the central aspect, the unifying theme of this prolific body of work, that is the focus of this essay: …