Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AJIL (1)
- American Journal of International Law (1)
- Appellate body (1)
- Appropriations bills (1)
- Court reform (1)
-
- Drug courts (1)
- Executive budget (1)
- Family court (1)
- Item veto (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial intervention (1)
- Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law (1)
- Problem-solving courts (1)
- Public finance (1)
- SSRN (1)
- Spending limit (1)
- State constitution (1)
- Status offenses (1)
- University of Chicago Law Review (1)
- WTO (1)
- World Trade Organization (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Letting Guidelines Be Guidelines (And Judges Be Judges), Gerard E. Lynch
Letting Guidelines Be Guidelines (And Judges Be Judges), Gerard E. Lynch
Faculty Scholarship
In a prescient New York Times op-ed piece entitled "Let Guidelines be Guidelines," written in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Blakely v. Washington, before certiorari was granted in United States v. Booker, Bill Stuntz of Harvard and Kate Stith Cabranes of Yale urged that the best solution for the constitutional crisis facing the United States Sentencing Guidelines would be to treat the Guidelines as guidelines, and not as a straightjacket. The Supreme Court evidently took a similar view, deciding in Booker that the Guidelines were constitutional only to the extent that they were not mandatory. The recent follow-up …
No Outsourcing Of Law? Wto Law As Practiced By Wto Courts, Petros C. Mavroidis
No Outsourcing Of Law? Wto Law As Practiced By Wto Courts, Petros C. Mavroidis
Faculty Scholarship
This article provides a critical assessment of the corpus of law that the adjudicating bodies of the World Trade Organization (WTO) – the Appellate Body (AB) and panels – have used since the organization was established on January 1, 1995. After presenting a taxonomy of WTO law, I move to discern, and to provide a critical assessment of, the philosophy of the WTO adjudicating bodies, when called to interpret it. In discussing the law that WTO adjudicating bodies have used, I distinguish between sources of WTO law and interpretative elements. This distinction will be explicated in part I below. Part …
Courts, Constitutions, And Public Finance: Some Recent Experiences From The States, Richard Briffault
Courts, Constitutions, And Public Finance: Some Recent Experiences From The States, Richard Briffault
Faculty Scholarship
Unlike the federal Constitution, virtually all state constitutions give detailed attention to questions of public finance. State constitutions limit spending, mandate certain types of spending, constrain taxation and debt, and require special procedures for enacting a budget. One consequence of the constitutionalization of the state fisc is its judicialization, as these measures trigger litigation. Fiscal and political conflicts turn into legal disputes, with courts joining governors and legislatures in shaping state budgets and making state fiscal policy.
This chapter provides an early-21st-century snapshot of the state constitutional law of state finance through a survey of six recent state supreme court …
Romancing The Court, Jane M. Spinak
Romancing The Court, Jane M. Spinak
Faculty Scholarship
Problem-solving courts, created at the end of the 20th century, make court-based solutions central to addressing significant societal problems, such as substance abuse and its impact on criminal activity and family functioning. Yet, lessons gleaned from over 100 years of family court history suggest that court-based solutions to intractable social problems have rarely been effective. This article asks three questions of the problem-solving court movement: What problem are we trying to solve? Is the court the best place to solve the problem? What are the consequences of giving authority to a court for solving the problem? Answering those questions through …
Overseers Or "The Deciders" – The Courts In Administrative Law, Peter L. Strauss
Overseers Or "The Deciders" – The Courts In Administrative Law, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
For the second time in a short period, Professors Miles and Sunstein have brought powerful tools of statistical analysis and diligent coding of circuit court of appeals opinions together to demonstrate what the Realists long ago taught us to suspect, that significant elements of judging can be explained in terms of the jurist's political world view – that the tension between law and politics is alive in judicial work as elsewhere and that it is only an aspiration to seek a world of laws and not of men. Elements of their work, though, appear as if in criticism of contemporary …