Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administration Law (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Coordination (1)
- Courts (1)
- Entry conditions (1)
-
- Exclusionary practices (1)
- FTC (1)
- Federal Trade Commission (1)
- Federal antitrust enforcement agencies (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal enforcement agencies (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- International Criminal Court (1)
- Judicial Review (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Liability (1)
- Market concentration (1)
- Market power (1)
- Mergers (1)
- Office Depot (1)
- Politics (1)
- Products Liability Law (1)
- Staples (1)
- States (1)
- Unilateral competitive effects (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Econometric Analysis In Ftc V. Staples, Jonathan Baker
Econometric Analysis In Ftc V. Staples, Jonathan Baker
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
In mid-1997, a federal district court in Washington, DC, granted the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC's) request for a preliminary injunction blocking the proposed merger of Staples and Office Depot (Federal Trade Commission v. Staples, Inc. [hereafter, Staples] 1997a). The transaction would have combined two of the nation's three leading office superstore chains. The firms chose not to pursue the case further after the preliminary injunction was issued, thus giving up on their efforts to merge.
Politics By Other Means: The Law Of The International Criminal Court, Diane Orentlicher
Politics By Other Means: The Law Of The International Criminal Court, Diane Orentlicher
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review Of Fda Preemption Determinations, Amanda Frost
Judicial Review Of Fda Preemption Determinations, Amanda Frost
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Policy Watch: Developments In Antitrust Economics, Jonathan Baker
Policy Watch: Developments In Antitrust Economics, Jonathan Baker
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
During the late 1970s and 1980s, the federal courts transformed antitrust rules and the federal enforcement agencies altered their case selection criteria in response to theories developed by industrial organization economists. These developments in economic thinking, often associated with the Chicago school, led current antitrust law and practice toward a greater skepticism about the relationship between market concentration and market power and a greater recognition of the possible efficiency-enhancing role of vertical agreements (contracts between firms and their customers or suppliers) than was present in the 1950s and 1960s.This survey will begin where those developments leave off by highlighting more …