Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- COVID-19 (2)
- Courts (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Alisson Sandoval (1)
- Brad Snyder (1)
-
- COVID-19 vaccine (1)
- Categorical logging (1)
- Categorical privilege logs (1)
- Chevron Corp. v. Salazar (1)
- Citron (1)
- Claim of privilege (1)
- Confrontation clause (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Craig Test (1)
- Criminal justice system (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Exceptional circumstances (1)
- Face-to-face confrontation (1)
- Fair play (1)
- Felix Frankfurter (1)
- Foreword: The Life (1)
- Is Jacobson v. Massachusetts Viable After a Century of Dormancy? A Review in the Face of COVID-19 (1)
- Jared S. Sunshine (1)
- Judicial restraint (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legislatures (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Litigators (1)
- Mandates (1)
- Maryland v. Craig (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Categorical Imperative: In Search Of The Mythical Perfect Privilege Log So Devoutly To Be Wished, Jared S. Sunshine
The Categorical Imperative: In Search Of The Mythical Perfect Privilege Log So Devoutly To Be Wished, Jared S. Sunshine
Touro Law Review
Though evidentiary privilege is amongst the most perplexing fields of the law, privilege logs are assuredly amongst the most vexing. With vastly increased discovery in the age of electronically stored information, the burdens incurred by individually articulating claims of privilege on every document have grown gargantuan. In desperate search of efficiencies, many commentators and courts have looked to “categorical” privilege logs that assert claims over generic groups of similar material rather than over each item seriatim. Disputes, however, have remained distressingly acrimonious, as these new categorical logs have proven no cure-all for the fundamental divergence of interests between litigants in …
“It’S The End Of The World As We Know It” –Redrafting Amendment To Federal Rule Of Criminal Procedure 26 To Allow Remote Testimony, Alisson Sandoval
“It’S The End Of The World As We Know It” –Redrafting Amendment To Federal Rule Of Criminal Procedure 26 To Allow Remote Testimony, Alisson Sandoval
Touro Law Review
During the COVID-19 pandemic, when society fought an aggressive and deadly virus, our connection to the outside world became predominantly virtual. Videoconference technology became essential in state and federal civil judicial proceedings. In light of the unprecedented challenges presented by the pandemic and its long-lasting impact on the criminal justice system, this Article argues for amending Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 26 to permit remote witness testimony when a witness is unavailable.
Foreword: The Life, Work & Legacy Of Felix Frankfurter, The Justice Known As “Ff”, Rodger D. Citron
Foreword: The Life, Work & Legacy Of Felix Frankfurter, The Justice Known As “Ff”, Rodger D. Citron
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Jacobson V. Massachusetts Viable After A Century Of Dormancy? A Review In The Face Of Covid-19, Sawan Talwar
Is Jacobson V. Massachusetts Viable After A Century Of Dormancy? A Review In The Face Of Covid-19, Sawan Talwar
Touro Law Review
The COVID-19 pandemic has stretched us into the vast unknowns, emotionally, logically, politically, and legally. Relying on their police power, governments inched into the darkness of the powers’ fullest extent, leaving many to wonder whether the exercise of this power was constitutional. This Article examines the extent of the police power that both the federal and state governments have, and how Jacobson v. Massachusetts1 was the “silver bullet” for governments across the United States. Further, this Article provides an overview of police power, and the status of COVID-19 mandates. This Article additionally examines quarantine case law and provides an analysis …