Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 11 of 11

Full-Text Articles in Law

Contract Interpretation Problems And The Dual Option Lease Dec 1972

Contract Interpretation Problems And The Dual Option Lease

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Pandemonium In The Administrative Resolution Of Government Contract Disputes, Leslie L. Megyeri Dec 1972

Pandemonium In The Administrative Resolution Of Government Contract Disputes, Leslie L. Megyeri

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Treatment Of Debtors, O. John Rogge Oct 1972

Treatment Of Debtors, O. John Rogge

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Anti-Claims Clause: Extinguishing A Contractor Remedy Oct 1972

The Anti-Claims Clause: Extinguishing A Contractor Remedy

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Discharged Attorney Is Limited To Quantum Meruit Recovery For The Reasonable Value Of His Services And The Right Of Recovery Under A Contingent Fee Contract Does Not Accrue Until The Occurrence Of The Contingency., Sean P. Martinez Jun 1972

A Discharged Attorney Is Limited To Quantum Meruit Recovery For The Reasonable Value Of His Services And The Right Of Recovery Under A Contingent Fee Contract Does Not Accrue Until The Occurrence Of The Contingency., Sean P. Martinez

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.


Contracts—Statue Of Frauds: Part Performance As A Basis For Money Damages—Miller V. Mccamish, 78 Wn.2d 821, 479 P.2d 919 (1971), Anon May 1972

Contracts—Statue Of Frauds: Part Performance As A Basis For Money Damages—Miller V. Mccamish, 78 Wn.2d 821, 479 P.2d 919 (1971), Anon

Washington Law Review

Plaintiff entered into an oral agreement to work defendant's farm for three years with an option to buy at the end of the term. The agreement specified that plaintiff would receive an annual salary, one-half of which would be retained and applied to the purchase price should plaintiff choose to buy the farm. On election to buy, plaintiff was to receive, as a credit towards the purchase price, one-third of the farm's increased value over $40,000. In addition, the agreement provided for a board of appraisers to settle potential disputes about the farm's value. Plaintiff took possession, made valuable improvements, …


The Insurance Contract And Policy In General As It Relates To North Carolina, Randal Rogers Apr 1972

The Insurance Contract And Policy In General As It Relates To North Carolina, Randal Rogers

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.


Government Contracts For Subsurface Excavation: Misrepresentation And Change Of Conditions Jan 1972

Government Contracts For Subsurface Excavation: Misrepresentation And Change Of Conditions

University of Richmond Law Review

Throughout the current century, federal, state and local governments have engaged the services of private construction companies in an increasing number of governmental construction projects. Many of these projects, such as the construction of roads, tunnels, dams, bridges, and buildings, require, at least to some degree, subsurface excavation. This comment deals with some of the legal problems facing contractors and governmental agencies in such excavation, and suggests possible solutions to these problems.


Cases And Materials On Contracts, Exchange Transactions And Relationships. By Ian R. Macneil., Charles Edward Donegan Jan 1972

Cases And Materials On Contracts, Exchange Transactions And Relationships. By Ian R. Macneil., Charles Edward Donegan

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Case Digest, Journal Staff Jan 1972

Case Digest, Journal Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

1. ADMIRALTY

A FEDERAL COURT Is NOT COMPELLED To ASSERT ITS ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION WHEN THE LITIGANTS HAVE INSUFFICIENT CONTACTS WITH THE UNITED STATES OR WHEN A GOOD FAITH CLAIM FOR EARNED WAGES IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE

SHIPOWNER GUILTY OF DERELECTION IN ITS NONDELEGABLE DUTY To FURNISH A SEAWORTHY VESSEL HELD NOT ENTITLED TO INDEMNIFICATION

INJUNCTION FOR THE REMOVAL OF A DAMAGED VESSEL CANNOT BE GRANTED IN A DIRECT ADMIRALTY PROCEEDING FOR THAT PURPOSE

SHIPOWNER'S LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO GOODS Is NOT LIMITED UNDER EITHER THE CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT OR THE FIRE STATUTE WHEN OWNER FAILED …


The Patent-Antitrust Balance: Proposals For Change, N.R. Powers Jan 1972

The Patent-Antitrust Balance: Proposals For Change, N.R. Powers

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.