Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- ADR Scholarship (1)
- Analogy of wisdom (1)
- Arbitrability (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Arbitration agreements (1)
-
- Arbitration clauses (1)
- Arbitration provision (1)
- Arbitrator (1)
- Common law (1)
- Consumer (1)
- Contract law (1)
- Contract terms (1)
- Course of performance (1)
- Dispute resolution (1)
- Formalism (1)
- Formalist (1)
- Graves (1)
- Jack Graves (1)
- Jack M. Graves (1)
- Legal process (1)
- Policing (1)
- Pro-arbitration (1)
- Problem of reliance (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Sale of goods (1)
- State law (1)
- Substantive unconscionability (1)
- UCC (1)
- UCC 1-303 (1)
- Unconscionability (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Course Of Performance As Evidence Of Intent Or Waiver: A Meaningful Preference For The Latter And Implications For Newly Broadened Use Under Revised U.C.C. Section 1-303, Jack M. Graves
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
One For All, But None For (All Of) One: Revised Article 1 Of The Uniform Commercial Code (Part 1 Of 2), Keith A. Rowley
One For All, But None For (All Of) One: Revised Article 1 Of The Uniform Commercial Code (Part 1 Of 2), Keith A. Rowley
Scholarly Works
This article examines four major differences between Revised Article 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code and Nevada's current (as of 2004) version of Article 1, codified at N.R.S. §§ 104.1101 et seq.
Arbitration, Unconscionability, And Equilibrium: The Return Of Unconscionability Analysis As A Counterweight To Arbitration Formalism, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Arbitration, Unconscionability, And Equilibrium: The Return Of Unconscionability Analysis As A Counterweight To Arbitration Formalism, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
However incomplete, unaggressive, or sub-optimal, unconscionability analysis of arbitration agreements has made something of a comeback in the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, water seeks to be level, and ecosystems work to retain environmental stability, the legal system has witnessed an incremental effort by lower courts to soften the rough edges of the Supreme Court's pro-arbitration jurisprudence through rediscovery of what might be called the “unconscionability norm”--a collective judicial view as to what aspects of an arbitration arrangement are too unfair to merit judicial enforcement. In rediscovering and reinvigorating the unconscionability norm …