Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Contracts - Assignments - Sufficiency Of Notice To A Bank Of The Assignment Of An Account, Michigan Law Review
Contracts - Assignments - Sufficiency Of Notice To A Bank Of The Assignment Of An Account, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
On March 25, 1933 an account in D Bank was assigned to P. A week later the bank received from P a formal statement of the assignment, which the bank totally ignored for nine months. In the meantime the bank debited the account for the price of thirty shares of its stock which the depositor-assignor bought in October. On January 2, 1934, D Bank acknowledged receipt of the letter of notice, but denied any liability to P thereunder. In a suit brought by P for the account, the only question was the right of D Bank to take the …
Carriers Distinction Between Common Carriers And Contract Carriers, Marcus L. Plant
Carriers Distinction Between Common Carriers And Contract Carriers, Marcus L. Plant
Michigan Law Review
In the recent case of Ace-High Dresses, Inc. v. J.C. Trucking Co., the defendant was a corporation organized for the purpose of doing a general trucking business. At the time of the suit it was operating under separate contracts with five dressmaking establishments, one of which was the plaintiff. Under these contracts the defendant trucked dress goods every day except Sunday. The goods were taken on in New York, carried to New Haven, Hartford or Bridgeport, left there until processed, and then taken back to New York. The defendant's drivers had keys to the factories of the processors, entered …
Vendor And Purchaser - Equitable Conversion - Application To Obligation To Extinguish Forest Fires, Michigan Law Review
Vendor And Purchaser - Equitable Conversion - Application To Obligation To Extinguish Forest Fires, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Montana statute placed the burden of extinguishing forest fires on the person on whose "property" the fire occurred, and, on failure of such person to extinguish it, made him liable to reimburse any authorized unit that should do so. Fire broke out on property owned by D, and a Government unit extinguished it. Previous to such fire, D had contracted to sell the land to X under a contract giving X the right of possession. Held, by the doctrine of equitable conversion, X was the beneficial owner, and the land was not D's "property" so as …