Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- European Court of Justice; Google Spain v. AEPD and Mario Costeja González; Google; Commission National de l'Informatique des Libertés; Consumers; Search engines; European Union; Internet Protocol; Martin v. Hearst Corporation; United States Supreme Court; Data Protection Directive; Direct 95/46/EC; Privacy; Internet; U.S. Citizens; Freedom of privacy; Freedom of speech; Universal Declaration of Human Rights; European Parliament; Globalization; European Commission; United States; Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Griswold v. Connecticut; Right to be forgotten; Data Protection Working Party; Miller v. California; First Amendment (1)
- Music; Music streaming services; Digital streaming; Copyright; Spotify; Rhapsody; Royalties; Consumer Rights Act; Loi Hamon; Apple; International Federation of Phonographic Industry; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Competition Appeal Tribunal; United States America (USA); United Kingdom (UK); France; Class representative; Class actions; Competition law; Deezer; Familles de France and Union Nationale des Associations Familiales; Digital distribution; Music industry (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Slipping Through The Cracks: How Digital Music Streaming Cuts Corners On Artists’ Royalty Revenues Globally, Frances Lewis
Slipping Through The Cracks: How Digital Music Streaming Cuts Corners On Artists’ Royalty Revenues Globally, Frances Lewis
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
At a time when the digital distribution of music is dominating the music industry, there are more music consumers than ever. This makes it vitally important for performing artists to receive the credit they are due. An inherent problem in music’s digital distribution market is that music streaming companies often fail to acquire proper licenses to expand their music libraries faster than their competitors. Performing artists who may not have the same income stream as their A-list counterparts often cannot bear the cost of litigation to pursue uncredited royalties. The U.S. class action model provides performing artists with a legal …
Looking Backward, Moving Forward: What Must Be Remembered When Resolving The Right To Be Forgotten, Katherine Stewart
Looking Backward, Moving Forward: What Must Be Remembered When Resolving The Right To Be Forgotten, Katherine Stewart
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
In May 2014, the European Court of Justice decided Google Spain v. AEPD and González and granted citizens the right to be forgotten, rather, the right to request any search engine offering services to European consumers to remove certain results displayed after a search of a citizen’s name. This decision has also resulted in an ongoing battle between Google and the Commission Nationale de l’Infomatique et des Libertés (CNIL), France’s data protection authority. The CNIL believes that Google must apply the right to be forgotten to all domains worldwide, including Google.com. Google, however, has been reluctant to do so, given …