Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Samsung C&T Corporation V Duro Felguera Australia Pty Ltd: Hybrid Claims Under The Construction Contracts Act 2004 (Wa), Sean Foy
The University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Property: A Missed Opportunity: Minnesota Supreme Court Shies Away From Clarifying The Discovery Rule To Toll The Statute Of Limitations In Construction-Defect Litigation—328 Barry Avenue, Llc V. Nolan Property Group, Llc, Sonali Garg
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Procedure—Property Improvement Claims—A History And Recommendation For Arkansas's Lone True Statute Of Repose, Luke K. Burton
Civil Procedure—Property Improvement Claims—A History And Recommendation For Arkansas's Lone True Statute Of Repose, Luke K. Burton
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
Determining the proper defendant for construction defects is largely dependent on the timing of the defect. Particularly, the sooner the defect develops after completion, the more likely that someone involved in the construction process is responsible. However, as time passes from the completion of construction to the development of a problem, it is more likely that the problems are the result of ordinary wear and tear rather than defective design or construction. Ark. Code Ann. § 16-56-112 (Statute) was enacted to manage these issues of timing and responsibility for construction defects by providing that homeowners may not bring suit against …