Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (4)
- Equal protection (3)
- Discrimination (2)
- Dissent (2)
- Fourteenth amendment (2)
-
- New york constitution (2)
- Title VII (2)
- United states constitution (2)
- (decided December 23 (1)
- 1989-90 Term (1)
- 1994) (1)
- ACLU (1)
- Affirmative Action (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Aid a religious school (1)
- Aid or inhibit religion (1)
- Amy Coney Barrett (1)
- Arkansas v. sanders (1)
- Article 78 proceeding (1)
- Article I section 12 (1)
- Article I section 6 (1)
- Attorney's fees (1)
- Aviel Menter (1)
- Blum (1)
- Bribery (1)
- Burden (1)
- Business necessity (1)
- C.D. Alexander Evans (1)
- Callahan (1)
- Candidate (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Multiple Choice: How Instant Runoff Voting Improves Redistricting Under The Voting Rights Act, Aviel Menter, C.D. Alexander Evans
Multiple Choice: How Instant Runoff Voting Improves Redistricting Under The Voting Rights Act, Aviel Menter, C.D. Alexander Evans
Touro Law Review
As currently interpreted, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”) can be a double-edged sword for minority representation. Although it gives protected minority groups their own majority/minority districts, this can dilute minority influence in other districts. Recently, however, many jurisdictions have begun to adopt Instant Runoff Voting (“IRV”), a ranked-choice voting system where voters rank multiple candidates in order of preference. By letting voters express support for multiple candidates, IRV provides useful information about the behavior of minority groups that courts can use when enforcing the VRA. Specifically, ranked-choice voting systems can better show when a winning candidate supported …
Rbg And Gender Discrimination, Eileen Kaufman
Section 1983 Litigation: Post-Pearson And Post-Iqbal, Karen M. Blum
Section 1983 Litigation: Post-Pearson And Post-Iqbal, Karen M. Blum
Touro Law Review
The Supreme Court's decision in Pearson v. Callahan marked a significant change in the structure of the analysis to be performedin the adjudication of the qualified immunity defense in§ 1983 litigation. Prior to Pearson, the Court required a mandatory two-step approach for the qualified immunity analysis. Whenever qualified immunity was raised in response to an alleged constitutional violation, the lower courts were instructed that the disposition of the qualified immunity issue required the court to first address the merits question. Under Saucier v. Katz, the courts were required first to decide whether the complaint stated a violation of a constitutional …
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, New York County: People V. Rodgers
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, New York County: People V. Rodgers
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process: Manshul Construction Corp. V. New York City School Construction Authority
Due Process: Manshul Construction Corp. V. New York City School Construction Authority
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Muncipal Law, Honorable Leon D. Lazer
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.