Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Commercial Difference, Felix T. Wu
The Commercial Difference, Felix T. Wu
William & Mary Law Review
When it comes to the First Amendment, commerciality does, and should, matter. This Article develops the view that the key distinguishing characteristic of corporate or commercial speech is that the interest at stake is “derivative,” in the sense that we care about the speech interest for reasons other than caring about the rights of the entity directly asserting a claim under the First Amendment. To say that the interest is derivative is not to say that it is unimportant, and one could find corporate and commercial speech interests to be both derivative and strong enough to apply heightened scrutiny to …
A Reverent Reflection Of The Splendid Scholarship Of Martin Redish—Does Reexamining Commercial Speech Shed Light On The Regrettable Reliance Upon Lie & Insult In Political Campaigns?, Douglas W. Kmiec
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction: The Moral Demands Of Commercial Speech, Andrew Koppelman
Introduction: The Moral Demands Of Commercial Speech, Andrew Koppelman
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
False Commercial Speech And The First Amendment: Understanding The Implications Of The Equivalency Principle, Martin H. Redish, Kyle Voils
False Commercial Speech And The First Amendment: Understanding The Implications Of The Equivalency Principle, Martin H. Redish, Kyle Voils
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Are Commercial Speech Cases Ideological? An Empirical Inquiry, Adam M. Samaha, Roy Germano
Are Commercial Speech Cases Ideological? An Empirical Inquiry, Adam M. Samaha, Roy Germano
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The empirical study of judicial behavior continues to grow and mature. The live challenges include specification, such as constructing useful conceptions and measures of ideology, mapping particular domains in which identifiable forces influence decisions, and quantifying the magnitudes of those influences. To make progress on these challenges, we roll out new and expanded datasets that build on the work of Cass Sunstein, Lee Epstein, Gregory Sisk, and others, and we report on the character of constitutional litigation today. Our datasets cover U.S. Court of Appeals decisions in five domains: (1) commercial speech, (2) gun rights, (3) abortion rights, (4) establishment …
No Regrets (Almost): After Virginia Board Of Pharmacy, Alan B. Morrison
No Regrets (Almost): After Virginia Board Of Pharmacy, Alan B. Morrison
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Commercial Speech And The Perils Of Parity, Frederick Schauer
Commercial Speech And The Perils Of Parity, Frederick Schauer
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.