Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (3)
- Selected Works (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
-
- Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Golden Gate University Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Anil Kalhan (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
-
- Cornell Law School J.D. Student Research Papers (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- John L. Gedid (1)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Luke A. Wake (1)
- Martin H Redish (1)
- Pace Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Ronald D. Rotunda (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- University of Colorado Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judging Myopia In Hindsight: Bivens Actions, National Security Decisions, And The Rule Of Law, Peter Margulies
Judging Myopia In Hindsight: Bivens Actions, National Security Decisions, And The Rule Of Law, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
Liability in national security matters hinges on curbing both official myopia and hindsight bias. The Framers knew that officials could be short-sighted, prioritizing expedience over abiding values. Judicial review emerged as an antidote to myopia of this kind. However, the Framers recognized that ubiquitous second-guessing of government decisions would also breed instability. Balancing these conflicting impulses has produced judicial oscillation between intervention and deference. Recent decisions on Bivens claims in the war on terror have defined extremes of deference or intervention. Cases like Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Arar v. Ashcroft display a categorical deference that rewards officials' myopia. On the …
Roche V. Worldwide Media, Inc.: Evaluating Where Minimum Contacts Meets Cyberspace, Ryan Thomas
Roche V. Worldwide Media, Inc.: Evaluating Where Minimum Contacts Meets Cyberspace, Ryan Thomas
Golden Gate University Law Review
In Roche v. Worldwide Media, Inc., the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia discussed the issue of personal jurisdiction in the context of cyberspace. The court determined that Worldwide Media's web site was passive and that asserting personal jurisdiction based solely on the maintenance of a web site, without more, would violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Roche decision reaffirmed the Eastern District of Virginia's position on personal jurisdiction in the context of cyberspace. Specifically, this decision applies the logic of the "sliding scale" test borrowed from the United States District Court …
Expanding The Jurisdictional Reach For Intentional Torts: Implications For Cyber Contacts, Christopher Allen Kroblin
Expanding The Jurisdictional Reach For Intentional Torts: Implications For Cyber Contacts, Christopher Allen Kroblin
Golden Gate University Law Review
Originally, the foundation of jurisdictional jurisprudence in the United States rested on the premise that no state could exercise jurisdiction over a person outside its territorial borders. With the advent of modern industrial society, solely territorial based notions of sovereignty and jurisdiction became strained and unworkable. The concept that a state has control over everything within its borders and nothing beyond began to erode. As a result, during the twentieth century, the courts began to shift their focus from a territorial concept of jurisdiction to a notice-based concept. State courts exercised jurisdictional powers beyond their geographical territory so long as …
The Fiduciary Theory Of Governmental Legitimacy And The Natural Charter Of The Judiciary, Luke A. Wake
The Fiduciary Theory Of Governmental Legitimacy And The Natural Charter Of The Judiciary, Luke A. Wake
Luke A. Wake
In legal academia, there are various claims as to the proper role of the courts and the standard of review to be employed in evaluating claims of right. These competing judicial philosophies have been the subject of great debate in recent years. Yet underlying these debates is the question of rights and whether men are entitled, in justice, to assurances of personal autonomy, or whether the concept of rights is a mere legal fiction.
In a recent article in the Journal of Law and Philosophy, Evan Fox-Decent argues that individuals are entitled, at a minimum, to certain guarantees of bodily …
Robinson At Large In The Fifty States: A Continuation Of The State Bills Of Rights Debate In The Search And Seizure Context, Perry A. Schaffer, Richard D. Harmon, Terry J. Helbush
Robinson At Large In The Fifty States: A Continuation Of The State Bills Of Rights Debate In The Search And Seizure Context, Perry A. Schaffer, Richard D. Harmon, Terry J. Helbush
Golden Gate University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is It Admissible?: Tips For Criminal Defense Attorneys On Assessing The Admissibility Of A Criminal Defendant's Statements, Part Two, John H. Blume, Emily C. Paavola
Is It Admissible?: Tips For Criminal Defense Attorneys On Assessing The Admissibility Of A Criminal Defendant's Statements, Part Two, John H. Blume, Emily C. Paavola
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Part One of this article addressed the Fifth Amendment issues to be considered when analyzing the admissibility of a criminal defendant's out-of-court statements. Part Two discusses the Sixth Amendment, the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause and impeachment issues.
Rethinking Immigration Detention, Anil Kalhan
Rethinking Immigration Detention, Anil Kalhan
Anil Kalhan
In recent years, scholars have drawn attention to the myriad ways in which the lines between criminal enforcement and immigration control have blurred in law and public discourse. This essay analyzes this convergence in the context of immigration detention. For decades, courts and observers have documented and analyzed a wide range of detention-related concerns, including mandatory and presumed custody, coercion and other due process violations, inadequate access to counsel, prolonged and indefinite custody, inadequate conditions of confinement, and violations of international law obligations. With the number of detainees skyrocketing since the 1990s, these concerns have rapidly proliferated - to the …
Equal Access And The Right To Marry, Nelson Tebbe, Deborah A. Widiss
Equal Access And The Right To Marry, Nelson Tebbe, Deborah A. Widiss
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
How should courts think about the right to marry? This is a question of principle, of course, but it has also become a matter of litigation strategy for advocates challenging different-sex marriage requirements across the country. We contend that courts and commentators have largely overlooked the strongest argument in support of a constitutional right to marry. In our view, the right to marry is best conceptualized as a matter of equal access to government support and recognition and the doctrinal vehicle that most closely matches the structure of the right can be found in the fundamental interest branch of equal …
Albany's Dysfunction Denies Due Process, Eric Lane, Laura Seago
Albany's Dysfunction Denies Due Process, Eric Lane, Laura Seago
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lethal Discrimination 2: Repairing The Remedies For Racial Discrimination In Capital Sentencing, J. Thomas Sullivan
Lethal Discrimination 2: Repairing The Remedies For Racial Discrimination In Capital Sentencing, J. Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Judicial Recusal & Expanding Notions Of Due Process, Andrey Spektor, Michael A. Zuckerman
Judicial Recusal & Expanding Notions Of Due Process, Andrey Spektor, Michael A. Zuckerman
Cornell Law School J.D. Student Research Papers
The merits of judicial elections have been litigated in journals around the country. In light of the recent Supreme Court decisions in White and Caperton, this debate will only intensify. Rather than revisit the arguments for and against electing judges, this Article argues that applying the Mathews v. Eldridge test in cases where a litigant’s due process is threatened by an elected judge—a possibility that the Court initially dismissed in White against Justice Ginsburg’s protests, and then took head on in Caperton—will balance First Amendment rights that judicial elections breed against the rights of the litigants that the Constitution protects. …
Gender Autonomy, Transgender Identity And Substantive Due Process: Finding A Rational Basis For Lawrence V. Texas, Jillian T. Weiss
Gender Autonomy, Transgender Identity And Substantive Due Process: Finding A Rational Basis For Lawrence V. Texas, Jillian T. Weiss
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
John Paul Stevens And Equally Impartial Government, Diane Marie Amann
John Paul Stevens And Equally Impartial Government, Diane Marie Amann
Scholarly Works
This article is the second publication arising out of the author's ongoing research respecting Justice John Paul Stevens. It is one of several published by former law clerks and other legal experts in the UC Davis Law Review symposium edition, Volume 43, No. 3, February 2010, "The Honorable John Paul Stevens."
The article posits that Justice Stevens's embrace of race-conscious measures to ensure continued diversity stands in tension with his early rejections of affirmative action programs. The contrast suggests a linear movement toward a progressive interpretation of the Constitution’s equality guarantee; however, examination of Stevens's writings in biographical context reveal …
Codifying Caperton V. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Ronald Rotunda
Codifying Caperton V. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Ronald Rotunda
Ronald D. Rotunda
Before Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 129 S. Ct. 2252, 2266 (2009). due process mandated judicial disqualification in two basic situations: first, when the judge had a direct, personal, and substantial pecuniary interest in the case, or second, when the judge acted as judge, jury, prosecutor, and complaining witness, and there was no need for an instant response. Caperton adds a third category. Due process requires a judge to disqualify himself if a person who is not a party (but is a principal officer of a party) has made substantial independent expenditures to support the successful judicial candidate or …
Back To The Future: Discovery Cost Allocation And Modern Procedural Theory, Martin H. Redish, Colleen Mcnamara
Back To The Future: Discovery Cost Allocation And Modern Procedural Theory, Martin H. Redish, Colleen Mcnamara
Martin H Redish
It has long been established that as a general rule, discovery costs are to remain with the party from whom discovery has been sought. While courts have authority to "shift" costs in an individual instance, the presumption against such an alteration in traditional practice is quite strong. Yet at no point did the drafters of the original Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ever make an explicit decision to allocate discovery costs in this manner. Nor, apparently, did they (or anyone since) ever explain why such an allocation choice is to be made in the first place. As a result, our …
Body And Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, And The Unitary Right To Abortion, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Body And Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, And The Unitary Right To Abortion, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Publications
This Article explores equality-based arguments for abortion rights, revealing both their necessity and their pitfalls. It first uses the narrowness of the "health exception" to abortion regulations to demonstrate why equality arguments are needed--namely because our legal tradition's conception of liberty is based on male experience, no theory of basic human rights grounded in women's reproductive experiences has developed. Next, however, the Article shows that equality arguments, although necessary, can undermine women's reproductive freedom by requiring that pregnancy and abortion be analogized to male experiences. As a result, equality arguments focus on either the bodily or the social aspect of …
Constitutional Contours For The Design And Implementation Of Multistate Renewable Energy Programs And Projects, Robin Kundis Craig
Constitutional Contours For The Design And Implementation Of Multistate Renewable Energy Programs And Projects, Robin Kundis Craig
University of Colorado Law Review
States are increasingly considering multistate efforts to promote the production, sale, and use of renewable energy. For example, in August 2009, policymakers and stakeholders gathered to consider joint renewable energy (specifically, wind energy) transmission projects among Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. This Article explores a number of constitutional issues that multistate efforts to encourage, market, transmit, or distribute renewable energy could raise. It reflects the reality that for energy, as for many other issues, multistate creativity in establishing new governance regimes or in implementing interstate projects often creates constitutional ambiguities. Many of these ambiguities center on the constitutional status-private …
Understanding Caperton: Judicial Disqualification Under The Due Process Clause, Dmitry Bam
Understanding Caperton: Judicial Disqualification Under The Due Process Clause, Dmitry Bam
Faculty Publications
It is virtually impossible to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. without hearing some variant of the following response: “I can’t believe it was as close as it was.” And it does not matter whether you are chatting with your next-door neighbor who had never thought about judicial ethics in his life or discussing the case with a judicial-recusal expert. Nearly everyone seems to agree: Caperton was an “easy” case and that four justices dissented is an indication that there is something terribly wrong. Not only has Caperton elevated the issue of judicial impartiality …
Equal Access And The Right To Marry, Deborah Widiss, Nelson Tebbe
Equal Access And The Right To Marry, Deborah Widiss, Nelson Tebbe
Articles by Maurer Faculty
How should courts think about the right to marry? This is a question of principle, of course, but it has also become a matter of litigation strategy for advocates challenging different-sex marriage requirements across the country. We contend that courts and commentators have largely overlooked the strongest argument in support of a constitutional right to marry. In our view, the right to marry is best conceptualized as a matter of equal access to government support and recognition and the doctrinal vehicle that most closely matches the structure of the right can be found in the fundamental interest branch of equal …
A Structural Vision Of Habeas Corpus, Eve Brensike Primus
A Structural Vision Of Habeas Corpus, Eve Brensike Primus
Articles
As scholars have recognized elsewhere in public law, there is no hermetic separation between individual rights and structural or systemic processes of governance. To be sure, it is often helpful to focus on a question as primarily implicating one or the other of those categories. But a full appreciation of a structural rule includes an understanding of its relationship to individuals, and individual rights can both derive from and help shape larger systemic practices. The separation of powers principle, for example, is clearly a matter of structure, but much of its virtue rests on its promise to help protect the …
Litigation Strategies For Dealing With The Indigent Defense Crisis, Eve Brensike Primus
Litigation Strategies For Dealing With The Indigent Defense Crisis, Eve Brensike Primus
Articles
The indigent defense delivery system in the United States is in a state of crisis. Public defenders routinely handle well over 1,000 cases a year, more than three times the number of cases that the American Bar Association says one attorney can handle effectively. As a result, many defendants sit in jail for months before even speaking to their court-appointed lawyers. And when defendants do meet their attorneys, they are often disappointed to learn that these lawyers are too overwhelmed to provide adequate representation. With public defenders or assigned counsel representing more than 80% of criminal defendants nationwide, the indigent …
Procedural Due Process In Pennsylvania: How The Commonwealth Court Clarified An Ambiguous Concept, John L. Gedid
Procedural Due Process In Pennsylvania: How The Commonwealth Court Clarified An Ambiguous Concept, John L. Gedid
John L. Gedid
No abstract provided.