Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Desegregation (2)
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- 2008 term (1)
- Bivens Doctrin (1)
-
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Coleman (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Correction officers (1)
- De facto segregation (1)
- Due process (1)
- Federal constitutional rights (1)
- Fundamental rights (1)
- Gender autonomy (1)
- Gregory Coleman Jr. (1)
- Grutter v. Bolinger (1)
- Integration policies (1)
- Lawrence v. Texas (1)
- Martin Schwartz (1)
- Municipalities (1)
- October 2008 Term (1)
- Parents Involved v. Seattle Schools (1)
- Pleading requirements (1)
- Prosecutorial immunity (1)
- Public schools (1)
- Qualifed immunity (1)
- Race and Education: The Future of Desegregation in the United States (1)
- Racial classification (1)
- Rational basis review (1)
- Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Race And Education: The Future Of Desegregation In The United States, Gregory Coleman Jr.
Race And Education: The Future Of Desegregation In The United States, Gregory Coleman Jr.
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
The Dream Of Equal Educational Opportunity Deferred, Giovanni Luciano Escobedo
The Dream Of Equal Educational Opportunity Deferred, Giovanni Luciano Escobedo
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Gender Autonomy, Transgender Identity And Substantive Due Process: Finding A Rational Basis For Lawrence V. Texas, Jillian T. Weiss
Gender Autonomy, Transgender Identity And Substantive Due Process: Finding A Rational Basis For Lawrence V. Texas, Jillian T. Weiss
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Litigation Under Section 1983 And The Bivens Doctrine In The October 2008 Term, Martin A. Schwartz
Constitutional Litigation Under Section 1983 And The Bivens Doctrine In The October 2008 Term, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
Section 1983 is the major enforcer of individual federal constitutional rights. It authorizes individuals to enforce their constitutional rights against state and local officials; for example,prison officers and police officers, and against municipalities. It is the most important civil statute in American law. To its credit, the United States Supreme Court understands the significance of § 1983.
For the past three decades, in virtually every single Term of theCourt, it has decided a substantial number of cases dealing with different facets of § 1983 litigation. Last Term, there was anunusual number of § 1983 decisions rendered by the United States …