Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Barriers To Smooth Sailing: 14 U.S.C. § 89(A) And The Fourth Amendment, Megan Jaye Kight
Constitutional Barriers To Smooth Sailing: 14 U.S.C. § 89(A) And The Fourth Amendment, Megan Jaye Kight
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals, People V. Batista
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals, People V. Batista
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals, People V. Quackenbush
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals, People V. Quackenbush
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Bronx County People V. Williams
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Bronx County People V. Williams
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals, People V. Gonzalez
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals, People V. Gonzalez
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dropping Anchor: Defining A Search In Compliance With Article I, Section 7 Of The Washington State Constitution, Daniel J. Clark
Dropping Anchor: Defining A Search In Compliance With Article I, Section 7 Of The Washington State Constitution, Daniel J. Clark
Seattle University Law Review
Section II examines State v. Myrick itself, including the Washington Supreme Court's path that led to that decision, the facts of the case, its reasoning, and its holding. Section III discusses the reaction to and effects of Myrick, including the seemingly disingenuous and inconsistent cases that have followed Myrick. Section IV outlines a proposal that more precisely defines a search in Washington, discussing the sources of the proposed test, examining how it would help guide Washington courts, and explaining which cases would be decided differently using the proposed standard.