Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- File Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Why The Right To Elective Abortion Fails Casey’S Own Interest-Balancing Methodology – And Why It Matters, Stephen G. Gilles
Why The Right To Elective Abortion Fails Casey’S Own Interest-Balancing Methodology – And Why It Matters, Stephen G. Gilles
Stephen G Gilles
Why the Right to Elective Abortion Fails Casey’s Own Interest-Balancing Methodology – and Why It Matters
Stephen G. Gilles
In Planned Parenthood v Casey, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the right to elective abortion before viability, but abandoned Roe v Wade’s characterization of it as a fundamental right that can be overcome only by a compelling state interest. Instead, Casey treats the right to elective abortion as grounded in an interest-balancing judgment that the woman’s liberty interest in terminating her pregnancy outweighs the state’s interest in protecting pre-viable fetal life. Remarkably, however, the Casey Court did not defend that interest-balancing judgment …
Justice Lewis F. Powell's Baffling Vote In Roe V. Wade, Samuel W. Calhoun
Justice Lewis F. Powell's Baffling Vote In Roe V. Wade, Samuel W. Calhoun
Samuel W. Calhoun
No abstract provided.
Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun
Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun
Samuel W. Calhoun
No abstract provided.
Who Deserves The Right To Decide On Abortion?, Alan E. Garfield
Who Deserves The Right To Decide On Abortion?, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Deadly Dicta: Roe’S “Unwanted Motherhood,” Gonzales’S “Women’S Regret” And The Shifting Narrative Of Abortion Jurisprudence, Stacy A. Scaldo
Deadly Dicta: Roe’S “Unwanted Motherhood,” Gonzales’S “Women’S Regret” And The Shifting Narrative Of Abortion Jurisprudence, Stacy A. Scaldo
Stacy A Scaldo
No abstract provided.