Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Biological fathers (1)
- Co-maternity (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional litigation (1)
- Constitutional maternity (1)
-
- Courts (1)
- Expedition act (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Maternal certainty (1)
- Maternity (1)
- Non biological mothers (1)
- Paternal certainty (1)
- Paternity (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Sex stereotypes (1)
- Stare decisis (1)
- Surrogacy (1)
- Three judge (1)
- Three judge district court (1)
- Three-judge (1)
- Transgender (1)
- Transgender discrimination (1)
- Vertical stare decisis (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The New Maternity, Courtney Megan Cahill
The New Maternity, Courtney Megan Cahill
Scholarly Publications
Constitutional law has long assumed that mothers andfathers are fundamentally different. Maternity, that law posits, is certain, obvious, and monolithic - consolidated in an easily identifiable person who is at once a biological, social, and legal parent. Paternity, in contrast, is construed as uncertain, nonobvious, relative, and often unclear. Over time, constitutional law has grown more insistent about the obviousness of motherhood. It also has cemented its idea of maternity into a fundamental principle of sex equality law that applies in settings - like transgender rights - that have nothing to do with certain mothers and uncertain fathers.
Constitutional law's …
Vertical Stare Decisis And Three-Judge District Courts, Michael T. Morley
Vertical Stare Decisis And Three-Judge District Courts, Michael T. Morley
Scholarly Publications
Three-judge federal district courts have jurisdiction over many issues central to our democratic system, including constitutional challenges to congressional and legislative districts, as well as to certain federal campaign-finance statutes. They are similarly responsible for enforcing key provisions of the Voting Rights Act. Litigants often have the right to appeal their rulings directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. Because of this unusual appellate process, courts and commentators disagree on whether such three-judge district court panels are bound by circuit precedent or instead are free to adjudicate these critical issues constrained only by U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
The applicability of court …