Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to abortion (1)
- Antitrust law (1)
- Civics education (1)
- Constitution Day (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
-
- DOMA cases (1)
- Fifth Circuit (1)
- High schools (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Jury reform (1)
- K-12 (1)
- Law schools (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Marriage equality (1)
- Marshall-Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project (1)
- Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas v. Abbott (1)
- Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1)
- Prop 8 (1)
- Public constitutional literacy (1)
- Structuralism (1)
- Symposium (1)
- TRAP (1)
- Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (1)
- Texas (1)
- Thirty-mile rule (1)
- Undue burden standard (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Marriage And The Court: San Francisco's Role In The Debate, Kathleen Morris
Marriage And The Court: San Francisco's Role In The Debate, Kathleen Morris
Publications
No abstract provided.
Undue Burdens In Texas, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Foreword: Public Constitutional Literacy; A Conversation, Melissa Hart
Foreword: Public Constitutional Literacy; A Conversation, Melissa Hart
Publications
No abstract provided.
A Structuralist Approach To The Two State Action Doctrines, Justin Desautels-Stein
A Structuralist Approach To The Two State Action Doctrines, Justin Desautels-Stein
Publications
By all accounts, the constitutional and antitrust state-action doctrines are strangers. Courts and scholars see the constitutional state-action doctrine as about the applicability of constitutional rights in private disputes, and the antitrust state-action doctrine as a judicial negotiation between the scope of the Sherman Act and the demands of federalism. In this conventional view, the only thing the doctrines share in common is that they are both an awful mess. This Article challenges the conventional wisdom and argues that the two state-action doctrines are fundamentally connected, and when viewed in a certain light, not even that messy. It is not …