Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
I Love You, Big Brother, Neal Devins
The Interactive Constitution: An Essay On Clothing Emperors And Searching For Constitutional Truth, Neal Devins
The Interactive Constitution: An Essay On Clothing Emperors And Searching For Constitutional Truth, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Government Lawyers And The New Deal, Neal Devins
Government Lawyers And The New Deal, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Through The Looking Glass: What Abortion Teaches Us About American Politics, Neal Devins
Through The Looking Glass: What Abortion Teaches Us About American Politics, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Constitution Between Friends, Neal Devins
The Constitution Between Friends, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Congressional Power And Free Speech: Levy’S Legacy Revisited, William W. Van Alstyne
Congressional Power And Free Speech: Levy’S Legacy Revisited, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of The Second American Revolution, Neal Devins
Book Review Of The Second American Revolution, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Edward Keyes' Undeclared War: Twilight Zone Of Constitutional Power, W. Taylor Reveley Iii
Edward Keyes' Undeclared War: Twilight Zone Of Constitutional Power, W. Taylor Reveley Iii
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Slouching Toward Bethlehem With The Ninth Amendment, William W. Van Alstyne
Slouching Toward Bethlehem With The Ninth Amendment, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
This review discusses Charles Black’s work “Decision According to Law”, which examines the tendency and the means used by activist judges to provide fair decisions through the use of more flexible principles of Constitutional law. While Black’s writing style is both informative and powerful, his original thesis regarding the Ninth Amendment acting as Congressional endorsement of the courts’ activist role is uncompelling and poorly supported.