Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Constitutional Law

University of Richmond

1975

Fuller v. Oregon

Articles 1 - 1 of 1

Full-Text Articles in Law

Constitutional Law-Equal Protection-Reimbursement Of Appointed Counsel Fees As A Condition Of Probation Held Not Violative Of The Equal Protection Clause Jan 1975

Constitutional Law-Equal Protection-Reimbursement Of Appointed Counsel Fees As A Condition Of Probation Held Not Violative Of The Equal Protection Clause

University of Richmond Law Review

Every defendant facing criminal prosecution that may result in imprisonment is guaranteed the right to counsel. The Supreme Court has required appointed counsel for indigents in widening classes of cases and at different stages of prosecution. This trend has increased the burden on public revenues, and many states, in an effort to recover some of the costs, have enacted recoupment statutes. Several state courts have expressed unfavorable opinions as to the constitutionality of these statutes. The first Supreme Court decision to focus on a state recoupment statute struck it down as violative of the equal protection clause.