Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adarand Constructors Inc. v. Pena (1)
- Agostini v. Felton (1)
- Bowen v. Kendrick (1)
- Bush v. Gore (1)
- Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board (1)
-
- Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist (1)
- Everson v. Board of Education (1)
- Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1)
- Gore v. Harris (1)
- Grovey v. Townsend (1)
- HHCA (1)
- Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1)
- Hawaiian Homes Commission Act (1)
- Johnson v. McIntosh (1)
- Larkin v. Grendel's Den (1)
- Lemon v. Kurtzman (1)
- McPherson v. Blacker (1)
- Meek v. Pittenger (1)
- Mitchell v. Helms (1)
- Morton v. Mancari (1)
- Mueller v. Allen (1)
- Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United States (1)
- OHA (1)
- Office of Hawaiian Affairs (1)
- Palm Beach County Canvassing Board v. Harris (1)
- Powell v. McCormack (1)
- Reynolds v. Sims (1)
- Rice v. Cayetano (1)
- Roe v. Wade (1)
- Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Presidential Election Case: Remembering Safe Harbor Day, Gary C. Leedes
The Presidential Election Case: Remembering Safe Harbor Day, Gary C. Leedes
University of Richmond Law Review
The 2000 presidential election transported the nation down a long and winding road without a map and headed in an uncertain direction. While it might be an exaggeration to say that the system of constitutional law was self-destructing, it is undoubtedly true that the events surrounding the election were spinning out of control, and that irreparable harm to the electoral process and thereby the nation was imminent.
Wielding The Ax Of Neutrality: The Constitutional Status Of Charitable Choice In The Wake Of Mitchell V. Helms, David J. Freedman
Wielding The Ax Of Neutrality: The Constitutional Status Of Charitable Choice In The Wake Of Mitchell V. Helms, David J. Freedman
University of Richmond Law Review
During the past decade, the Supreme Court loosened restraints that it had previously imposed upon government aid to religious institutions. In 1996, Congress and the President seized upon this phenomenon and implemented a controversial provision in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996-also known as the Welfare Reform Act of 1996. Included among the various revolutionary provisions of this legislation is something known as Charitable Choice. This program authorizes states to contract with religious institutions to provide social welfare services on behalf ofthe states.
The Fate Of The Native Hawaiians: The Special Relationship Doctrine, The Problem Of Strict Scrutiny, And Other Issues Raised By Rice V. Cayetano, William E. Spruill
The Fate Of The Native Hawaiians: The Special Relationship Doctrine, The Problem Of Strict Scrutiny, And Other Issues Raised By Rice V. Cayetano, William E. Spruill
University of Richmond Law Review
Harold "Freddy" Rice is a Native Hawaiian in the sense that he was born in the Hawaiian Islands and can "trace[ ] his ancestry to two members of the legislature of the Kingdom of Hawaii, prior to the Revolution of 1893. " He is a taxpayer and a qualified elector of the United States, the State of Hawaii, and the County of Hawaii. When Rice applied to vote in the 1996 election for the trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs ("OHA"), however, his application was denied. Why? Because, according to a state statute, he was not Hawaiian enough.