Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Casenotes: Constitutional Criminal Law — Life Sentence Without Parole Imposed On Recidivist Guilty Of Seven Non-Violent Crimes Constitutes Cruel And Unusual Punishment Under The Eighth Amendment Proportionality Test — Solem V. Helm, 103 S.Ct. 3001 (1983), Elizabeth Gilbert Osterman Jan 1984

Casenotes: Constitutional Criminal Law — Life Sentence Without Parole Imposed On Recidivist Guilty Of Seven Non-Violent Crimes Constitutes Cruel And Unusual Punishment Under The Eighth Amendment Proportionality Test — Solem V. Helm, 103 S.Ct. 3001 (1983), Elizabeth Gilbert Osterman

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Recent Developments: Unconstitutional Sex-Based Mortality Tables, Robert J. Farley Jan 1984

Recent Developments: Unconstitutional Sex-Based Mortality Tables, Robert J. Farley

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Search And Seizure — 19 U.S.C. § 1581(A) — Random And Suspicionless Boarding Of Vessel By Customs Officers Does Not Violate The Fourth Amendment's Prohibition Against Unreasonable Search And Seizure. United States V. Villamonte-Marquez, 103 S. Ct. 2573 (1983), Richard Lloyd Miller Jan 1984

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Search And Seizure — 19 U.S.C. § 1581(A) — Random And Suspicionless Boarding Of Vessel By Customs Officers Does Not Violate The Fourth Amendment's Prohibition Against Unreasonable Search And Seizure. United States V. Villamonte-Marquez, 103 S. Ct. 2573 (1983), Richard Lloyd Miller

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: Constitutional Law - Upon Proof Of His Insanity By A Preponderance Of The Evidence, Due Process Does Not Require Limiting The Confinement Of An Insanity Acquittee To The Hypothetical Maximum Sentence He Could Have Received. Jones V. United States, 103 S. Ct. 3043 (1983), Lori Lynn Blair Jan 1984

Casenotes: Constitutional Law - Upon Proof Of His Insanity By A Preponderance Of The Evidence, Due Process Does Not Require Limiting The Confinement Of An Insanity Acquittee To The Hypothetical Maximum Sentence He Could Have Received. Jones V. United States, 103 S. Ct. 3043 (1983), Lori Lynn Blair

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.