Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- General (12)
- Constitutional law (10)
- Constitution. 1st Amendment (6)
- Federal government (4)
- Freedom of expression (3)
-
- Freedom of speech (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- United States (3)
- United States. Congress (3)
- Constitution. 2nd Amendment (2)
- Constitutional law--United States. (2)
- District of Columbia v. Heller (2)
- Firearms (2)
- Firearms--Law and legislation (2)
- Interstate commerce--Law and legislation--United States. (2)
- Judicial power (2)
- Law--Interpretation and construction (2)
- Property (2)
- Self-defense (2)
- Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994) (1)
- Arrest (1)
- Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886) (1)
- Campaign funds--Law and legislation (1)
- Cartagena Agreement (1969) (1)
- Church and state (1)
- Coal (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitution. 4th Amendment (1)
- Constitutional Interpretation (1)
- Constitutional amendments (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Law
Pleading For A Bargain: The Upcoming Debate Over Competing Standards Of Prejudice In Missouri V. Frye, Ian Hampton
Pleading For A Bargain: The Upcoming Debate Over Competing Standards Of Prejudice In Missouri V. Frye, Ian Hampton
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Forbidden Territory Or Well-Defined Boundaries? M.B.Z. V. Clinton And The Overzealous Application Of The Political Question Doctrine, Andrew Hand
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Crying Wolfish: The Upcoming Challenge To Blanket Strip-Search Policies In Florence V. Board Of Chosen Freeholders, Aaron Johnson
Crying Wolfish: The Upcoming Challenge To Blanket Strip-Search Policies In Florence V. Board Of Chosen Freeholders, Aaron Johnson
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Golan V. Holder: Congressional Power Under The Copyright Clause And The First Amendment, Claire Fong
Golan V. Holder: Congressional Power Under The Copyright Clause And The First Amendment, Claire Fong
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
It’S My Church And I Can Retaliate If I Want To: Hosanna-Tabor And The Future Of The Ministerial Exception, Brad Turner
It’S My Church And I Can Retaliate If I Want To: Hosanna-Tabor And The Future Of The Ministerial Exception, Brad Turner
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Bullcoming V. New Mexico: Revisiting Analyst Testimony After Melendez-Diaz, Alex Herskowitz
Bullcoming V. New Mexico: Revisiting Analyst Testimony After Melendez-Diaz, Alex Herskowitz
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
The Significance Of It All: Corporate Disclosure Obligations In Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. V. Siracusano, Siobhan Innes-Gawn
The Significance Of It All: Corporate Disclosure Obligations In Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. V. Siracusano, Siobhan Innes-Gawn
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
A Deal Is A Deal In The West, Or Is It? Montana V. Wyoming And The Yellowstone River Compact, Shiran Zohar
A Deal Is A Deal In The West, Or Is It? Montana V. Wyoming And The Yellowstone River Compact, Shiran Zohar
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
A Father’S Presence: Flores-Villar V. United States And Equal Protection, Jeffrey Hochstetler
A Father’S Presence: Flores-Villar V. United States And Equal Protection, Jeffrey Hochstetler
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Lacking Swiss Precision: The First-Sale Doctrine In Costco V. Omega, Justin Yedor
Lacking Swiss Precision: The First-Sale Doctrine In Costco V. Omega, Justin Yedor
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same: Schwarzenegger V. Entertainment Merchants Association, Beatrice M. Hahn
The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same: Schwarzenegger V. Entertainment Merchants Association, Beatrice M. Hahn
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Bruesewitz V. Wyeth: The “Unavoidable” Vaccine Problem, Sara Wexler
Bruesewitz V. Wyeth: The “Unavoidable” Vaccine Problem, Sara Wexler
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Staub V. Proctor Hospital: Cleaning Up The Cat’S Paw, Hannah Banks
Staub V. Proctor Hospital: Cleaning Up The Cat’S Paw, Hannah Banks
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Harrington V. Richter: Aedpa Deference And The Right To Effective Counsel, Kara Duffle
Harrington V. Richter: Aedpa Deference And The Right To Effective Counsel, Kara Duffle
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Snyder V. Phelps: First Amendment Boundaries On Speech-Based Tort Claims, Michael Villeggiante
Snyder V. Phelps: First Amendment Boundaries On Speech-Based Tort Claims, Michael Villeggiante
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
Legal Integration In The Andes: Law-Making By The Andean Tribunal Of Justice, Laurence R. Helfer, Karen J. Alter
Legal Integration In The Andes: Law-Making By The Andean Tribunal Of Justice, Laurence R. Helfer, Karen J. Alter
Faculty Scholarship
The Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ) is a copy of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and the third most active international court. This article reviews our findings based on an original coding of all ATJ preliminary rulings from 1984 to 2007, and over forty interviews in the region. We then compare Andean and European jurisprudence in three key areas: whether the tribunals treat the founding integration treaties as constitutions for their respective communities, whether the ATJ and ECJ have implied powers for community institutions that are not expressly enumerated in the founding treaties, and how the tribunals conceive of …
Viewpoint Neutrality And Government Speech, Joseph Blocher
Viewpoint Neutrality And Government Speech, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
Government speech creates a paradox at the heart of the First Amendment. To satisfy traditional First Amendment tests, the government must show that it is not discriminating against a viewpoint. And yet if the government shows that it is condemning or supporting a viewpoint, it may be able to invoke the government speech defense and thereby avoid constitutional scrutiny altogether. Government speech doctrine therefore rewards what the rest of the First Amendment forbids: viewpoint discrimination against private speech. This is both a theoretical puzzle and an increasingly important practical problem. In cases like Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum, the …
Popular Constitutionalism And The State Attorneys General, Joseph Blocher
Popular Constitutionalism And The State Attorneys General, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
In her article Dead or Alive: Originalism as Popular Constitutionalism in Heller, Professor Reva Siegel argued that the Supreme Court’s opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller relied on originalism to enforce understandings of the Second Amendment that were forged in the late twentieth century through popular constitutionalism. In this Response, Professor Joseph Blocher argues that those understandings reappeared in McDonald v. City of Chicago, in part through the efforts of thirty-eight state attorneys general (SAGs) who filed an amicus brief urging the Court to incorporate the Second Amendment against the states. The SAGs invoked federalism, but their arguments …
The Regrettable Clause: United States V. Comstock And The Powers Of Congress, H. Jefferson Powell
The Regrettable Clause: United States V. Comstock And The Powers Of Congress, H. Jefferson Powell
Faculty Scholarship
In this Article, Powell argues that in Comstock, the Court encountered one of the oldest and most basic constitutional issues about the scope of congressional power-whether there are justiciable limits to the range of legitimate ends Congress may pursue. The Justices, without fully recognizing the fact, were taking sides in an ancient debate, and in doing so, they inadvertently reopened an issue that ought to be deemed long settled. Part II of the Article first addresses the question before the Court in Comstock, which was limited to a pure question of Article I law: is a specific provision of a …
Retail Rebellion And The Second Amendment, Darrell A. H. Miller
Retail Rebellion And The Second Amendment, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
When, if ever, is there a Second Amendment right to kill a cop? This piece seeks to answer that question. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment codifies a natural right to keep and bear arms for self-defense. That right to self-defense extends to both private and public threats, including self-defense against agents of a tyrannical government. Moreover, the right is individual. Individuals -- not just communities -- have the right to protect themselves from public violence. Individuals -- not just militias -- have the right to defend themselves against tyranny. In McDonald …
Reverse Incorporation Of State Constitutional Law, Joseph Blocher
Reverse Incorporation Of State Constitutional Law, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
State supreme courts and the United States Supreme Court are the independent and final arbiters of their respective constitutions, and may therefore take different approaches to analogous state and federal constitutional issues. Such issues arise often, because the documents were modeled on each other and share many of the same guarantees. In answering them, state courts have, as a matter of practice, generally adopted federal constitutional doctrine as their own. Federal courts, by contrast, have largely ignored state constitutional law when interpreting the federal constitution. In McDonald v. Chicago, to take only the most recent example, the Court declined to …
The Conflicted Assumptions Of Modern Constitutional Law, H. Jefferson Powell
The Conflicted Assumptions Of Modern Constitutional Law, H. Jefferson Powell
Faculty Scholarship
Contribution to Symposium - The Nature of Judicial Authority: A Reflection on Philip Hamburger's Law and Judicial Duty
Reasoning About The Irrational: The Roberts Court And The Future Of Constitutional Law, H. Jefferson Powell
Reasoning About The Irrational: The Roberts Court And The Future Of Constitutional Law, H. Jefferson Powell
Faculty Scholarship
Commentary on the future direction of the Roberts Court generally falls along lines that correlate with the commentators' political views on the desirability of the Court's recent decisions. A more informative approach is to look for opinions suggesting changes in the presuppositions with which the Justices approach constitutional decision making. In footnote 27 in his opinion for the Court in the District of Columbia v. Heller Second Amendment decision, Justice Scalia suggested a fundamental revision of the Court's assumptions about the role of judicial doctrine, and the concept of rationality, in constitutional law. Justice Scalia would eliminate the normative aspects …
Case For Calling An Article V Convention, Paul D. Carrington
Case For Calling An Article V Convention, Paul D. Carrington
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Constitutional Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioner, Ernest A. Young
Brief Of Constitutional Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioner, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Constitutionalizing Local Politics, Joseph Blocher, Ilan Graff
Constitutionalizing Local Politics, Joseph Blocher, Ilan Graff
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Transforming Property Into Speech, Joseph Blocher
Transforming Property Into Speech, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Guns, Inc.: Citizens United, Mcdonald, And The Future Of Corporate Constitutional Rights, Darrell A. H. Miller
Guns, Inc.: Citizens United, Mcdonald, And The Future Of Corporate Constitutional Rights, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court began its 2009 Term by addressing the constitutional rights of corporations. It ended the Term by addressing the incorporated rights of the Constitution. In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, a five-member majority of the Court held that corporations have a First Amendment right to spend their own money on political advocacy. A corporation generally is no different than a natural person when it comes to the First Amendment - at least as it relates to political speech. In McDonald v. City of Chicago, a plurality of the Court held that the Second Amendment to the United …
Crisis In The Legal Profession: Don’T Mourn, Organize!, Michael E. Tigar
Crisis In The Legal Profession: Don’T Mourn, Organize!, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Roberts’ Rules: The Assertiveness Of Rules-Based Jurisprudence, Joseph Blocher
Roberts’ Rules: The Assertiveness Of Rules-Based Jurisprudence, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.