Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 12 of 12

Full-Text Articles in Law

Section 8: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School Oct 1996

Section 8: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School

Supreme Court Preview

No abstract provided.


David Shapiro's Adversary Statement On Federalism, Patrick E. Higginbotham May 1996

David Shapiro's Adversary Statement On Federalism, Patrick E. Higginbotham

Michigan Law Review

A Review of David L. Shapiro, Federalism: A Dialogue


Turning Congress Into An Agency: The Propriety Of Requiring Legislative Findings, Harold J. Krent Feb 1996

Turning Congress Into An Agency: The Propriety Of Requiring Legislative Findings, Harold J. Krent

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Introduction To Symposium, The New Federalism After United States V. Lopez, Jonathan L. Entin Jan 1996

Introduction To Symposium, The New Federalism After United States V. Lopez, Jonathan L. Entin

Faculty Publications

Introduction to Symposium, The New Federalism After United States v. Lopez, Cleveland, Ohio, 1996.


Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly Jan 1996

Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Term Limits Case, Bennett L. Gershman Jan 1996

The Term Limits Case, Bennett L. Gershman

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


States' Repeal: A Proposed Constitutional Amendment To Reinvigorate Federalism, Aaron J. O'Brien Jan 1996

States' Repeal: A Proposed Constitutional Amendment To Reinvigorate Federalism, Aaron J. O'Brien

Cleveland State Law Review

The lack of both legislative and judicial integrity led to a governmental system which is federalist in name but centrally planned in reality. Congress regularly passes laws which stretch the conceivable bounds of its powers. By failing to overturn such legislation, the Supreme Court ignores the benefits of federalism and the significance of dual sovereignty. These changes render the individual citizen's opinion rather meaningless while attacking the roots of democracy and threatening the liberties early Americans so earnestly tried to preserve. The People are left without a mechanism through which to speak on a national level. Because of this dissolution …


New Federalism And Constitutional Criminal Procedure: Are We Repeating The Mistakes Of The Past?, James W. Diehm Jan 1996

New Federalism And Constitutional Criminal Procedure: Are We Repeating The Mistakes Of The Past?, James W. Diehm

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Term Limits Dissent: What Nerve, Robert F. Nagel Jan 1996

The Term Limits Dissent: What Nerve, Robert F. Nagel

Publications

No abstract provided.


The Future Of Federalism, Robert F. Nagel Jan 1996

The Future Of Federalism, Robert F. Nagel

Publications

No abstract provided.


S. 1629b The Tenth Amendment Enforcement Act Of 1996: Hearings On S. 1629 Before The Committee On Governmental Affairs 104th Cong. 2d Sess. 232-241 & 247-257, Mary Brigid Mcmanamon Dec 1995

S. 1629b The Tenth Amendment Enforcement Act Of 1996: Hearings On S. 1629 Before The Committee On Governmental Affairs 104th Cong. 2d Sess. 232-241 & 247-257, Mary Brigid Mcmanamon

Mary Brigid McManamon

No abstract provided.


New Federalism And Constitutional Criminal Procedure: Are We Repeating The Mistakes Of The Past?, James W. Diehm Dec 1995

New Federalism And Constitutional Criminal Procedure: Are We Repeating The Mistakes Of The Past?, James W. Diehm

James W. Diehm

More than thirty years have passed since the United States Supreme Court made these observations in the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio." The Court, no doubt, thought it was putting an end to the wrenching problems that developed since it laid the groundwork for the exclusionary rule in Boyd v. United States in 1886. Although the merits of the exclusionary rule have been debated for many years and will be debated for years to come, the advent of the exclusionary rule raised important issues of federalism that were not resolved easily.