Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
Article Iii And The Adequate And Independent State Grounds Doctrine , Cynthia L. Fountaine
Article Iii And The Adequate And Independent State Grounds Doctrine , Cynthia L. Fountaine
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transcript: Must Congress End The Disenfranchisement Of The District Of Columbia? A Constitutional Debate , American University Law Review
Transcript: Must Congress End The Disenfranchisement Of The District Of Columbia? A Constitutional Debate , American University Law Review
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
To Heal Another Or To Protect Oneself?: Hiv Under The Ada In Light Of Bragdon V. Abbott, Leah Guidry
To Heal Another Or To Protect Oneself?: Hiv Under The Ada In Light Of Bragdon V. Abbott, Leah Guidry
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Section 1983 Developments: October 1998 Term, Martin A. Schwartz
Supreme Court Section 1983 Developments: October 1998 Term, Martin A. Schwartz
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
City Of Boerne V. Flores Wrecks Rfra: Searching For Nuggets Among The Rubble, John Gatliff
City Of Boerne V. Flores Wrecks Rfra: Searching For Nuggets Among The Rubble, John Gatliff
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Much Sound, Not Too Much Fury: The Supreme Court's Criminal Law Decisions During The 1997 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Much Sound, Not Too Much Fury: The Supreme Court's Criminal Law Decisions During The 1997 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mr. Justice Holmes's Constitutionally Crooked Path Part Ii: The State Sovereignty Jurisdictional Stopgap , Mitchell B. Weiss
Mr. Justice Holmes's Constitutionally Crooked Path Part Ii: The State Sovereignty Jurisdictional Stopgap , Mitchell B. Weiss
Cleveland State Law Review
This article analyzes the last turn in Justice Holmes's constitutionally crooked path, largely by penetrating to the very core of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Alden v. Maine. Part I therefore traces the Court's waffling attitude towards the division of regulatory power between the state and federal governments. Then, against this backdrop, Part II takes the jurisdictional turn by analyzing the Court's most recent attempt to resuscitate the Tenth Amendment's check on Congress's Commerce Power. To sharpen the focus, much of this article will focus on the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal statute that always seems to sit …
Discrimination Cases In The Supreme Court's 1997 Term, Eileen Kaufman
Discrimination Cases In The Supreme Court's 1997 Term, Eileen Kaufman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Establishment Clause And Government Religious Displays: The Court That Stole Christmas, Jennifer H. Greenhalgh
The Establishment Clause And Government Religious Displays: The Court That Stole Christmas, Jennifer H. Greenhalgh
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Enemies Of The Crown To Regional Telephone Companies: Bills Of Attainder Reappraised, Michael L. Landsman
From Enemies Of The Crown To Regional Telephone Companies: Bills Of Attainder Reappraised, Michael L. Landsman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Agency, Equality, And Antidiscrimination Law , Tracy E. Higgins, Laura A. Rosenbury
Agency, Equality, And Antidiscrimination Law , Tracy E. Higgins, Laura A. Rosenbury
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court increasingly has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause as a mandate for the state to treat citizens as if they were equal-as a limitation on the state's ability to draw distinctions on the basis of characteristics such as race and, to a lesser extent, gender. In the context of race, the Court has struck down not only race-specific policies designed to harm the historically oppressed, but race conscious policies designed to foster racial equality. Although in theory the Court has left open the possibility that benign uses of race may be constitutional under some set of facts, in …
Supreme Court Section 1983 Developments, Martin A. Schwartz
Supreme Court Section 1983 Developments, Martin A. Schwartz
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Nea V. Finley: A Decision In Search Of A Rationale, Lackland H. Bloom Jr.
Nea V. Finley: A Decision In Search Of A Rationale, Lackland H. Bloom Jr.
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Debate has raged over whether Congress can constitutionally restrict, or at least influence, the ability of the National Endowment for the Arts (“NEA”) to award grants to artists and institutions for the creation or display of art work that a significant segment of the public would consider highly offensive. In the October 1997 Term, the Supreme Court, by an 8-1 margin in NEA v. Finley, upheld section 954(d), a 1991 congressional amendment to the NEA Act that requires the Chairperson of the NEA to ensure that, in establishing regulations and procedures for assessing artistic excellence and artistic merit, “general standards …
Breard, Printz, And The Treaty Power, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Breard, Printz, And The Treaty Power, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article considers whether the anti-commandeering principle of New York v. United States and Printz v. United States applies to exercises of the Treaty Power. It illustrates the problem with an analysis of the treaty provision involved in Breard v. Greene, 118 S. Ct. 1352 (1998), which requires state officials to notify certain aliens they arrest that they have a right to consult with their consul. Whether exercises of the treaty power are subject to the commandeering prohibition depends on the resolution of two ambiguities in the Supreme Court's anti-commandeering doctrine. The first concerns the distinction between commandeering and …
Cleaning Up The Legal Debris Left In The Wake Of Whitewater, Susan Low Bloch
Cleaning Up The Legal Debris Left In The Wake Of Whitewater, Susan Low Bloch
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
We have learned a lot in the twenty-five years since Watergate. During the scandal itself, we confirmed that the President is not above the law. We learned that executive privilege is constitutionally protected, but that it is not absolute. And, we learned that a need exists for an independent counsel, but that we don't necessarily need a statute to establish such an office.
Watergate and the Nixon era spawned several so-called "reforms": the establishment of the independent counsel statute, presidential immunity from civil damage suits for official action, and public ownership of the President's official papers. It is interesting and …