Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judicial appointments (2)
- Absolute dominion (1)
- Age of majority (1)
- Ark. R. Crim. P. 17.1 (1)
- Brady (1)
-
- Brady v. Maryland (1)
- Buckley v. Fitzsimmons (1)
- Capacity to consent (1)
- Compensable taking (1)
- Consensual sexual relationship (1)
- Consent (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Doe v. Pulaski County Special School District (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Due process (1)
- Duty of disclosure (1)
- Echols v. State (1)
- Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Day (1)
- Exculpatory evidence (1)
- Fraser's Lewd and Vulgar Requirement (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Fundamental right to privacy (1)
- Groundwater (1)
- Indigent representation (1)
- Ineffective assistance of counsel (1)
- Internet speech (1)
- Morse v. Frederick (1)
- Obama's judicial appointments (1)
- Paschal v. State (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
Nearing Thirty Years: The Burger Court, Strickland V. Washington, And The Parameters Of The Right To Counsel, Joshua Kastenberg
Nearing Thirty Years: The Burger Court, Strickland V. Washington, And The Parameters Of The Right To Counsel, Joshua Kastenberg
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Education—Student-Teacher Relationship—Should Teachers Be Held To A Higher Standard? Understanding The Laws Governing Sexual Relationships Between Students And Teachers In Primary And Secondary Schools Paschal V. State, 2012 Ark. 127, 388 S.W.3d 429., Katelyn Burch Busby
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—First Amendment—Social Media Rams The Tinker Schoolhouse Gate: A New Approach For Online Student Speech, S. Kate Fletcher
Constitutional Law—First Amendment—Social Media Rams The Tinker Schoolhouse Gate: A New Approach For Online Student Speech, S. Kate Fletcher
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Con Law Professor With Judicial Appointment Power, Theresa M. Beiner
The Con Law Professor With Judicial Appointment Power, Theresa M. Beiner
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Avoiding The Unavoidable: The Canon Of Constitutional Avoidance As Applied To The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act, T. J. Fosko
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Breaking Down The Supreme Court’S Spending Clause Ruling In Nfib V. Sebelius: A Huge Blow To The Federal Government Or A Mere Bump In The Road?, Ellen K. Howard
Breaking Down The Supreme Court’S Spending Clause Ruling In Nfib V. Sebelius: A Huge Blow To The Federal Government Or A Mere Bump In The Road?, Ellen K. Howard
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Let Them Eat . . . Broccoli?, Josie G. Richardson
Let Them Eat . . . Broccoli?, Josie G. Richardson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act: A Constitutional Analysis, David C. Jung
The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act: A Constitutional Analysis, David C. Jung
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Sixth Amendment—Braving Confrontation: Arkansas’S Progressive Position Regarding Criminal Defendants’ Confrontation Rights At Sentencing, Cassie R. Howell
Constitutional Law—Sixth Amendment—Braving Confrontation: Arkansas’S Progressive Position Regarding Criminal Defendants’ Confrontation Rights At Sentencing, Cassie R. Howell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Rise And Demise Of The Absolute Dominion Doctrine For Groundwater, Joseph W. Dellapenna
The Rise And Demise Of The Absolute Dominion Doctrine For Groundwater, Joseph W. Dellapenna
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
Increased human populations, together with increased per capita water usage and climate changes, have resulted in our planet coping with greater water shortages than ever before. Groundwater has played, and will continue to play, a critical role in dealing with water shortages. Consequently, more and more attention, legal and otherwise, is being given to groundwater across the United States.
Much legal confusion about groundwater exists. For starters, there is no single legal definition for groundwater. Moreover, the law has developed legal categories such as percolating water and underground streams which, while contradictory to scientific hydrology, remain embedded in the law. …
The Con Law Professor With Judicial Appointment Power, Theresa M. Beiner
The Con Law Professor With Judicial Appointment Power, Theresa M. Beiner
Faculty Scholarship
This essay explores whether, how or, perhaps, to what extent President Barack Obama’s time as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago is reflected in his approach to judicial appointments. Three things are striking about President Obama’s initial approach to judicial selection. First, he has appointed the most diverse bench of any President. Second, he has appointed judges rather slowly compared to his predecessors. And, finally, he has appointed a rather politically moderate bench. How might these particular and in some ways surprising aspects of President Obama’s judicial appointments reflect – or not reflect – his time as …
Brady, Arkansas Rule 17.1, And Disclosure Of Scientific Evidence And Expert Opinion, J. Thomas Sullivan
Brady, Arkansas Rule 17.1, And Disclosure Of Scientific Evidence And Expert Opinion, J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
The United States Constitution as well as state procedural rules require prosecutorial authorities to disclose evidence to the defense as a means for ensuring fairness in the prosecution of individuals charged with criminal offenses. When prosecutorial authorities fail to disclose evidence as required, the integrity of the criminal justice system is threatened and the defense is unable to adequately prepare for trial. This threat is illustrated and magnified by the substantiation of prosecutorial misconduct claims in high profile trials where prosecutors have been unable to resist the temptation not to disclose evidence that could damage the prosecution's case, or, where …