Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Due process (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- 14th amendment (1)
- 15th Annual Supreme Court Review (1)
- ADA (1)
-
- Adarand constructors v. pena (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Arcila (1)
- Bakke (1)
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Boston (1)
- Bright line (1)
- British Rule (1)
- Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington (1)
- Campbell (1)
- Chicago Tribune (1)
- Civil penalty (1)
- Civil search (1)
- Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates v. Wells (1)
- Color (1)
- Consensual homosexual sodomy (1)
- Consent (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Cook County Illinois v. United States (1)
- Delgado (1)
- Deseriee A. Kennedy (1)
- Deseriee Kennedy (1)
- Desert Palace v. Costa (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Eileen Kaufman (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Supreme Court 2002 Term - The Property Cases: Iolta, Qui Tam Actions, And Punitive Damages (Symposium: The Fifteenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Leon D. Lazer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Dazzling The World: A Study Of India's Constitutional Amendment Mandating Reservations For Women On Rural Panchayats, Eileen Kaufman, Louise Harmon
Dazzling The World: A Study Of India's Constitutional Amendment Mandating Reservations For Women On Rural Panchayats, Eileen Kaufman, Louise Harmon
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review And Diversity, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Judicial Review And Diversity, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Discrimination Cases Of The 2002 Term (Symposium: The Fifteenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Eileen Kaufman
Discrimination Cases Of The 2002 Term (Symposium: The Fifteenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Eileen Kaufman
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Special Needs And Special Deference: Suspicionless Civil Searches In The Modern Regulatory State, Fabio Arcila
Special Needs And Special Deference: Suspicionless Civil Searches In The Modern Regulatory State, Fabio Arcila
Scholarly Works
This Article examines the Supreme Court’s application of the "special needs" principle, which is part of its Fourth Amendment search and seizure jurisprudence, with an emphasis on suspicionless searches. It argues that both courts and commentators have insufficiently acknowledged the tension between the modern regulatory state, which is significantly dependent upon such searches, and adequately protecting liberty interests. The commentators who criticize the Court’s deference ignore that a deferential approach can be justified. Suspicionless civil searches, for example, are not necessarily incompatible with original intent. Moreover, the many proposals for reforming suspicionless civil search jurisprudence, such as reinvigorating the individualized …
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Due Process Denied: Judicial Coercion In The Plea Bargaining Process, Richard Klein
Due Process Denied: Judicial Coercion In The Plea Bargaining Process, Richard Klein
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.