Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Comparative and Foreign Law

Selected Works

2008

Comparative Law

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Free Speech And Holocaust Denial, Russell L. Weaver Oct 2008

Free Speech And Holocaust Denial, Russell L. Weaver

Russell L. Weaver

Even though no reputable historian denies the existence of the Holocaust, or the six million deaths that resulted, Holocaust denial is on the ascendance. The British Broadcasting Company has suggested that Holocaust survivors are aging and dying off, thereby resulting in more efforts to deny that the Holocaust ever really occurred. In addition, the development of the Internet, and the ease with which it can be accessed, has made it easier for Holocaust deniers to communicate with themselves and others. As one commentator noted, “hate has gone high tech. Hatemongers used to meet in dingy basements; now they meet online. …


Judgments Of The United States Supreme Court And The South African Constitutional Court As A Basis For A Universal Method To Resolve Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights, Daniel H. Erskine Feb 2008

Judgments Of The United States Supreme Court And The South African Constitutional Court As A Basis For A Universal Method To Resolve Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights, Daniel H. Erskine

Daniel H. Erskine

This article describes the methods utilized by the United States Supreme Court to resolve specific cases involving conflicts between federal constitutional rights, a federal constitutional right and a state constitutional or statutory right, and an international treaty right and a federal constitutional right. Consideration of particular decisions representative of the manner the Court resolves conflicts between rights in the three typologies described above, illustrates how the Court views such conflicts and the rationales employed to resolve apparent conflicting rights. The rationales used by the United States Supreme Court are compared to the South African Constitutional Court’s decisions in the Soobramoney, …


The Trial Of Queen Caroline And The Impeachment Of President Clinton: Law As A Weapon For Political Reform, Daniel H. Erskine Jan 2008

The Trial Of Queen Caroline And The Impeachment Of President Clinton: Law As A Weapon For Political Reform, Daniel H. Erskine

Daniel H. Erskine

This article explores the calculated use of legal mechanisms to impact national politics and the effect such utilization had on accomplishing deliberate political reform. In answering why political actors use legal procedures as political weapons and whether such use is effective, this paper analyzes two historical examples to illustrate that law as political weapon is extremely successful in accomplishing political change. In the early 1800’s, England’s King sought to defrock his politically radical heroine Queen Caroline through the parliamentary mechanism of a Bill of Pains and Penalties, which caused a flourish of public criticism and call for political revolution. Public …


Invited Comparative Commentary To The 67th Biennial German Jurists Meeting, Thomas Kohler Dec 2007

Invited Comparative Commentary To The 67th Biennial German Jurists Meeting, Thomas Kohler

Thomas C. Kohler

No abstract provided.


Избирательные Системы Стран Ближнего Востока: Сравнительный Анализ, Leonid G. Berlyavskiy Dec 2007

Избирательные Системы Стран Ближнего Востока: Сравнительный Анализ, Leonid G. Berlyavskiy

Leonid G. Berlyavskiy

Electoral systems of Middle East countries are in formation stage. They are under construction on the basis of principles confessionalism (the Lebanese republic), ideologies pan - Arabian generality and «the Arabian socialism» (Arabian Republic Egypt), democratic political mode (State of Israel), influences them the form of government in (Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kingdom Morocco).


Избирательное Право Итальянской Республики И Федеративной Республики Германии: Сравнительный Анализ, Leonid G. Berlyavskiy Dec 2007

Избирательное Право Итальянской Республики И Федеративной Республики Германии: Сравнительный Анализ, Leonid G. Berlyavskiy

Leonid G. Berlyavskiy

The present article purpose is the comparative analysis of Electoral Law of two European states leading members of the European Union: the Italian Republic and Federal Republic of Germany. Both states have endured the periods of fascist dictatorships, post-war democratisation, have the stable constitutional systems, the developed economy. At the same time, from the point of view of the suffrage, each of them differs essential features