Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Article III Courts (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
- Causation (1)
- Damages (1)
- Future interests (1)
-
- Government misconduct (1)
- Injuries (1)
- Institutional defendants (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Legal standards (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Monell v. Department of Social Services (1)
- Monroe v. Pape (1)
- Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati (1)
- Perpetuities (1)
- Property (1)
- Reasonable doubt (1)
- Responsibility (1)
- Rizzo v. Goode (1)
- Rule against perpetuities (1)
- Section 1983 (1)
- Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities (1)
- Uniform acts (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Government Responsibility For Constitutional Torts, Christina B. Whitman
Government Responsibility For Constitutional Torts, Christina B. Whitman
Articles
This essay is about the language used to decide when governments should be held responsible for constitutional torts.' Debate about what is required of government officials, and what is required of government itself, is scarcely new. What is new, at least to American jurisprudence, is litigation against government units (rather than government officials) for constitutional injuries. 2 The extension of liability to institutional defendants introduces special problems for the language of responsibility. In a suit against an individual official it is easy to describe the wrong as the consequence of individual behavior that is inconsistent with community norms; the language …
Burden Of Proof, James Boyd White
Burden Of Proof, James Boyd White
Book Chapters
Although the Constitution does not mention burden of proof, certain principles are widely accepted as having constitutional status. The first and most significant of these is the rule that in a criminal case the government must prove its case ‘‘beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT.’’ This is the universal COMMON LAW rule, and was said by the Supreme Court in IN RE WINSHIP (1970) to be an element of DUE PROCESS. This standard is commonly contrasted with proof ‘‘by a preponderance of the evidence’’ or ‘‘by clear and convincing evidence.’’ The standard of proof is in practice not easily susceptible to further …
The Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities, Lawrence W. Waggoner
The Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities, Lawrence W. Waggoner
Articles
When the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws recently approved the Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities, it may at long last have made perpetuity reform achievable in this country. Coming, as it does, on the heels of the 1981 promulgation of the Restatement (Second) of Property (Donative Transfers), which adopts the same general type of perpetuity reform, and having been unanimously endorsed by the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association, the Board of Regents of the American College of Probate Counsel, and the Board of Governors of the American College of Real Estate Lawyers, the Uniform …