Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Child Exploitation Material (1)
- Computer Cache (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Drone (1)
- Drone Operations (1)
-
- Drone Regulations Development (1)
- Drones (1)
- Federal Aviation Regulations (1)
- Intention to Possess (1)
- Intention to View (1)
- Knowing Possession (1)
- Law (1)
- National Airspace System (1)
- Nuissance (1)
- Nuissance Law (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Property Law (1)
- UAS (1)
- UAS Regulations Development (1)
- UAS operations (1)
- UAV (1)
- Viewing Child Exploitation Material (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Drones: Where Does The National Airspace System Start?, Jason T. Lorenzon J.D.
Drones: Where Does The National Airspace System Start?, Jason T. Lorenzon J.D.
National Training Aircraft Symposium (NTAS)
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), Unmanned Aeronautical Vehicles (UAV), drones and Personal Aerial Vehicles (PAV) constitute the greatest technological advancement since the jet age. (Elaine Chao, Secretary of Transportation, October 26, 2017) This technological advancement has prompted significant public policy challenges and the need for new laws regarding navigable airspace. This proposal investigates how airspace used by drones will evolve given existing Constitutional and common law principals. These principals will influence the creation, development and modification of UAS airspace regulations by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
Two critical but unanswered questions concerning the National Airspace System, are where does navigable airspace …
Possession Of Child Exploitation Material In Computer Temporary Internet Cache, Sungmi Park, Yunsik Jake Jang, Joshua I. James
Possession Of Child Exploitation Material In Computer Temporary Internet Cache, Sungmi Park, Yunsik Jake Jang, Joshua I. James
Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law
When considering the possession of child exploitation material U.S. and German courts have the same focus, but slightly different interpretations. This slight difference in interpretation could mean that in one country a defendant will be found guilty of possession while in the other country he or she could be found not guilty. In this work we examine the standards courts in Germany and the United States have used to combat child pornography, and analyze the approaches specifically related to viewing and possession of CEM. A uniform solution is suggested that criminalizes “knowing access with the intention to view” as a …