Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ABL (1)
- Access to credit (1)
- Asset-based lending (1)
- Bibb (1)
- Business credit (1)
-
- Capacity building (1)
- Civil code (1)
- Claims (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Crystallization (1)
- Equipment (1)
- Extraterritoriality (1)
- Interstate commerce (1)
- Inventory (1)
- Japan (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Minpō (1)
- Monitoring (1)
- Movables (1)
- National Pork (1)
- Overcollateralization (1)
- Perfection (1)
- Proposition 12 (1)
- Public guarantee (1)
- Receivables (1)
- Registration (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Regulatory mismatch (1)
- SMEs (1)
- Secured transactions (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
National Pork Is A Bibb Case, Not A Pike Case, Michael S. Knoll, Ruth Mason
National Pork Is A Bibb Case, Not A Pike Case, Michael S. Knoll, Ruth Mason
All Faculty Scholarship
In October 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, a Ninth Circuit case out of California, dismissing a challenge to Proposition 12, which, inter alia, bans the sale of wholesome pork (without regard to where it was produced) from the offspring of breeding sows confined in a manner California voters consider “cruel.” National Pork thus puts the Court in the position of choosing between the often-criticized undue-burden strand of the dormant Commerce Clause and California’s request that the Court approve its ban on out-of-state pork not because of the products’ qualities, but …
Brief Of Professors Michael Knoll And Ruth Mason As Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners In National Pork Producers Council V. Ross, Michael S. Knoll, Ruth Mason
Brief Of Professors Michael Knoll And Ruth Mason As Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners In National Pork Producers Council V. Ross, Michael S. Knoll, Ruth Mason
All Faculty Scholarship
The district court erred when it concluded that because Proposition 12 applies only to in-state sales, it could not be extraterritorial. On the contrary, because California regulates pork production based on domestic, inbound, and outbound sales, its regulation is internally inconsistent and overbroad. As an obligation of interstate comity, this Court has understood extraterritoriality to require the basis of regulation to be internally consistent. A regulation is internally consistent when, if every state regulated using the same nexus as the challenged state, cross-border commercial activity would not be regulated by more than one state. Proposition 12 cannot meet this basic …
Secured Transactions Law Reform In Japan: Japan Business Credit Project Assessment Of Interviews And Tentative Policy Proposals, Megumi Hara, Kumiko Koens, Charles W. Mooney Jr.
Secured Transactions Law Reform In Japan: Japan Business Credit Project Assessment Of Interviews And Tentative Policy Proposals, Megumi Hara, Kumiko Koens, Charles W. Mooney Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
This article summarizes key findings from the Japan Business Credit Project (JBCP), which involved more than 30 semi-structured interviews conducted in Japan from 2016 through 2018. It was inspired by important and previously unexplored questions concerning secured financing of movables (business equipment and inventory) and claims (receivables)—“asset-based lending” or “ABL.” Why is the use of ABL in Japan so limited? What are the principal obstacles and disincentives to the use of ABL in Japan? The interviews were primarily with staff of banks, but also included those of government officials and regulators, academics, and law practitioners. The article proposes reforms of …