Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (143)
- SelectedWorks (38)
- American University Washington College of Law (27)
- Seattle University School of Law (23)
- University of Michigan Law School (17)
-
- William & Mary Law School (17)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (15)
- Columbia Law School (13)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (11)
- University of Baltimore Law (10)
- University of Colorado Law School (9)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (9)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (8)
- New York Law School (8)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (8)
- University of Miami Law School (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- University of Southern Maine (7)
- Duke Law (6)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (5)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (5)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad (4)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights (52)
- Discrimination (49)
- Civil rights (35)
- Race (35)
- Title VII (28)
-
- Employment discrimination (27)
- Constitutional Law (17)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (15)
- Racial discrimination (13)
- Same-sex marriage (13)
- Employment Discrimination (12)
- Equality (11)
- Human rights (11)
- Religion (11)
- Criminal Justice (10)
- Direito Constitucional (10)
- Disparate impact (10)
- Racial Bias (10)
- Section 1983 (10)
- Task Force (10)
- Task Force on Race and the Criminal Justice System (10)
- United States Supreme Court (10)
- Washington (10)
- Marriage (9)
- Minorities (9)
- Education (8)
- Law and Society (8)
- Race and law (8)
- Bias (7)
- CRTP (7)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (33)
- Paulo Ferreira da Cunha (28)
- All Faculty Scholarship (25)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (20)
- Faculty Publications (14)
-
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (14)
- Mark S. Brodin (11)
- Seattle University Law Review (11)
- Articles (10)
- Eileen Kaufman (9)
- Publications (9)
- Faculty Articles (8)
- Popular Media (8)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (8)
- University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review (8)
- NYLS Law Review (7)
- Scholarly Works (7)
- Torch: The Civil Rights Team Project Newsletter (7)
- Beatriz Ramirez (6)
- Francine T. Sherman (6)
- Prof. Elizabeth Burleson (6)
- Robert M. Bloom (6)
- Daniel Kanstroom (5)
- Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (5)
- Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (5)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (4)
- Bruno L. Costantini García (4)
- Elisabeth Keller (4)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 519
Full-Text Articles in Law
Legal Lines In Shifting Sand: Immigration Law And Human Rights In The Wake Of September 11, Daniel Kanstroom
Legal Lines In Shifting Sand: Immigration Law And Human Rights In The Wake Of September 11, Daniel Kanstroom
Daniel Kanstroom
In March of 2004, a group of legal scholars gathered at Boston College Law School to examine the doctrinal implications of the events of September 11, 2001. They reconsidered the lines drawn between citizens and noncitizens, war and peace, the civil and criminal systems, as well as the U.S. territorial line. Participants responded to the proposition that certain entrenched historical matrices no longer adequately answer the complex questions raised in the “war on terror.” They examined the importance of government disclosure and the public’s right to know; the deportation system’s habeas corpus practices; racial profiling; the convergence of immigration and …
Criminalizing The Undocumented: Ironic Boundaries Of The Post-September 11th ‘Pale Of Law.’, Daniel Kanstroom
Criminalizing The Undocumented: Ironic Boundaries Of The Post-September 11th ‘Pale Of Law.’, Daniel Kanstroom
Daniel Kanstroom
The general hypothesis put forth in this Article is that well-accepted historical matrices are increasingly inadequate to address the complex issues raised by various U.S. government practices in the so-called “war on terrorism.” The Article describes certain stresses that have recently built upon two major legal dichotomies: the citizen/non-citizen and criminal/civil lines. Professor Kanstroom reviews the use of the citizen/non-citizen dichotomies as part of the post-September 11th enforcement regime and considers the increasing convergence between the immigration and criminal justice systems. Professor Kanstroom concludes by suggesting the potential emergence of a disturbing new legal system, which contains the worst features …
"Passed Beyond Our Aid:" U.S. Deportation, Integrity, And The Rule Of Law, Daniel Kanstroom
"Passed Beyond Our Aid:" U.S. Deportation, Integrity, And The Rule Of Law, Daniel Kanstroom
Daniel Kanstroom
The United States is still in the midst of a massive deportation experiment that is exceptionally sweeping and harsh by virtually any historical or comparative measure. In the last twenty-five years, the number of non-citizen deportations has exceeded 25 million. It is therefore important to think critically about how deportation is really working, especially as to many hundreds of thousands of green-card holders. These individuals have grown up, been fully acculturated, attended school, and raised families in the United States. Upon deportation, they are separated from their families and sent to places where they frequently have few acquaintances, do not …
The Right To Deportation Counsel In Padilla V. Kentucky: The Challenging Construction Of The Fifth-And-A-Half Amendment, Daniel Kanstroom
The Right To Deportation Counsel In Padilla V. Kentucky: The Challenging Construction Of The Fifth-And-A-Half Amendment, Daniel Kanstroom
Daniel Kanstroom
The U.S. Supreme Court’s pathbreaking decision in Padilla v. Kentucky seems reasonably simple and exact: Sixth Amendment norms were applied to noncitizen Jose Padilla’s claim that his criminal defense counsel was ineffective due to allegedly incorrect advice concerning the risk of deportation. This was a very significant move with virtues of both logic and justice. It will likely prevent many avoidable and wrongful deportations. It may also help some deportees who have been wrongly or unjustly deported in the past. However, the apparent exactness of the case, as a Sixth Amendment decision, raises fundamental constitutional questions. For more than a …
Padilla V. Kentucky And The Evolving Right To Deportation Counsel: Watershed Or Work-In-Progress?, Daniel Kanstroom
Padilla V. Kentucky And The Evolving Right To Deportation Counsel: Watershed Or Work-In-Progress?, Daniel Kanstroom
Daniel Kanstroom
Though widely heralded by immigration and human rights lawyers as a “landmark,” possible “watershed,” and even “Gideon decision” for immigrants, Padilla v. Kentucky is perhaps better understood as a Rorschach test, than as a clear constitutional precedent. It is surely a very interesting and important U.S. Supreme Court case in the (rapidly converging) fields of immigration and criminal law in which the Court struggles with the functional relationship between ostensibly “civil” deportation proceedings and criminal convictions. This is a gratifying development, for reasons not only of justice, fairness, proportionality, and basic human decency, but also (perhaps) of doctrinal consistency. The …
Standing Mute At Arrest As Evidence Of Guilt: The 'Right To Silence' Under Attack, Frank R. Herrmann S.J., Brownlow M. Speer
Standing Mute At Arrest As Evidence Of Guilt: The 'Right To Silence' Under Attack, Frank R. Herrmann S.J., Brownlow M. Speer
Frank R. Herrmann, S.J.
It is commonly understood that an arrested person has a right to remain silent and that the government may not use his or her silence to prove guilt at trial. Three Circuit Courts of Appeal, however, reject this understanding. They allow the prosecution to use an arrested person's pre-Miranda silence as direct evidence of guilt. This article argues that those Circuits are wrong. The article, first, demonstrates the historical antiquity of the Common Law principle that a detained person has the right to stand mute. Though the right was limited by statutory incursion and in tension, at times, with the …
Disparate Impact Is Not Unconstitutional, Michael Evan Gold
Disparate Impact Is Not Unconstitutional, Michael Evan Gold
Michael Evan Gold
[Excerpt] In Ricci v. DeStefano, the "New Haven Firefighters" case, whitefirefighters and one Hispanic firefighter sued the city of New Haven, Connecticut and city officials under Title VII. The plaintiffs claimed the city had committed intentional discrimination or disparate treatment against them when the city disregarded the results of promotion examinations that had an adverse effect on black and Hispanic applicants. The Supreme Court sustained the claim. In his concurring opinion, Justice Scalia invited attorneys in subsequent cases to consider arguing that the disparate impact theory of employment discrimination is unconstitutional. He reasoned as follows: • The Constitution prohibits the …
When A Rapist Is A She:The Quest For Gender Neutral Law In Tanzania, Roman Joseph Msaki
When A Rapist Is A She:The Quest For Gender Neutral Law In Tanzania, Roman Joseph Msaki
Roman joseeph Msaki
The Quest for Gender Neutral Law in Tanzania
Torch (November/December 2011), Brandon Baldwin, Civil Rights Team Project
Torch (November/December 2011), Brandon Baldwin, Civil Rights Team Project
Torch: The Civil Rights Team Project Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Tragic Rights: The Rights Critique In The Age Of Obama, Robin L. West
Tragic Rights: The Rights Critique In The Age Of Obama, Robin L. West
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fighting For The Debtor's Soul: Regulating Religious Commercial Conduct, Michael A. Helfand
Fighting For The Debtor's Soul: Regulating Religious Commercial Conduct, Michael A. Helfand
Michael A Helfand
Although courts often think of religion in terms of faith, prayer, and conscience, many religious groups are increasingly looking to religion as a source of law, commerce, and contract. As a result, courts are being called upon to regulate conduct that is simultaneously religious and commercial. In addressing such cases, some courts minimize the religious features of the case and simply focus on its secular elements while others over-exaggerate the religious features of the case and thereby refuse to adjudicate the dispute on Establishment Clause grounds. As an example of this dynamic, I explore the constitutionality of imposing sanctions for …
Noción Y Elementos Existenciales Del Título De Crédito, Bruno L. Costantini García
Noción Y Elementos Existenciales Del Título De Crédito, Bruno L. Costantini García
Bruno L. Costantini García
Discernir la noción y elementos de existencia de los títulos de crédito, considerando la doctrina y la denominación expresada en nuestra Ley General de Títulos y Operaciones de Crédito, conceptualizando el término de los documentos que consignan un derecho crediticio propio de su naturaleza y deslindando de manera dogmatica y exegética los elementos que lo forman y le dan su funcionamiento, mediante una visión de las instituciones jurídicas que les dan su existencia y aplicación dentro del devenir de los actos de comercio.
Moderator, Questions Of Social Justice, Francine Sherman
Moderator, Questions Of Social Justice, Francine Sherman
Francine T. Sherman
No abstract provided.
United States V. Leon And Its Ramifications, Robert M. Bloom
United States V. Leon And Its Ramifications, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
“A More Majestic Conception:” The Importance Of Judicial Integrity In Preserving The Exclusionary Rule, Robert M. Bloom, David H. Fentin
“A More Majestic Conception:” The Importance Of Judicial Integrity In Preserving The Exclusionary Rule, Robert M. Bloom, David H. Fentin
Robert M. Bloom
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Warren Court held that the so-called exclusionary rule was applicable to the states. Subsequent Supreme Courts have shown their disenchantment with the rule by seeking to curb its applicability. Most recently, the Court has characterized the exclusionary rule as a “massive remedy” to be applied only as a “last resort.” The Courts’ analytical framework for the last thirty-five years for cutting back the exclusionary rule was a balancing test which weighed the costs of suppressing reliable evidence with the benefits of deterring future police violations. This balancing has been used most recently in two …
Warrant Requirement -- The Burger Court Approach, Robert M. Bloom
Warrant Requirement -- The Burger Court Approach, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
Judicial Integrity: A Call For Its Re-Emergence In The Adjudication Of Criminal Cases, Robert M. Bloom
Judicial Integrity: A Call For Its Re-Emergence In The Adjudication Of Criminal Cases, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
A court can invalidate or rectify certain kinds of offensive official action on the grounds of judicial integrity. In the past, it has served as a check on overzealous law enforcement agents whose actions so seriously impaired due process principles that they shocked the bench’s conscience. The principle not only preserves the judiciary as a symbol of lawfulness and justice, but it also insulates the courts from becoming aligned with illegal actors and their bad acts. The 1992 case of U.S. v. Alvarez-Machain, however, may have signaled a departure from past practices. This article reviews current Supreme Court cases and …
Inevitable Discovery: An Exception Beyond The Fruits, Robert M. Bloom
Inevitable Discovery: An Exception Beyond The Fruits, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And Its Purported Preference For Search Warrants, Robert M. Bloom
The Supreme Court And Its Purported Preference For Search Warrants, Robert M. Bloom
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.
A Dream Deferred, Ruth-Arlene W Howe
A Dream Deferred, Ruth-Arlene W Howe
Ruth-Arlene W. Howe
Presentation at the MLK Annual Unity Breakfast, Boston College, January 19, 2005.
Hidden In Plain Sight: Achieving More Just Results In Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Cases By Re-Examining Supreme Court Precedent, Elisabeth A. Keller, Judith B. Tracy
Hidden In Plain Sight: Achieving More Just Results In Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Cases By Re-Examining Supreme Court Precedent, Elisabeth A. Keller, Judith B. Tracy
Judith B. Tracy
Lower federal courts often fail to provide plaintiffs in sexual harassment cases the relief intended by Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964 and mandated by the Supreme Court when it recognized the cause of action twenty years ago. There is little doubt that sexual harassment in the workplace persists. However, lower courts misapply or ignore Supreme Court reasoning that would result in fairer and more consistent dispositions in hostile work environment sexual harassment cases. This article draws directly on reasoning from the Supreme Court cases to explain the sources of the confusion in the lower courts and offers …
Ows, Discourse, And Narratives, Timothy Zick
First Amendment Interests And Copyright Accommodations, David S. Olson
First Amendment Interests And Copyright Accommodations, David S. Olson
David S. Olson
Copyright law exists to encourage the creation of works of authorship by granting exclusive rights. But copyright’s incentive function seems in tension with the public’s First Amendment interests to use and freely hear copyrighted speech. Conventional wisdom holds, however, that copyright law serves to encourage much more speech than it discourages, and resolves First Amendment concerns with protections internal to copyright law like the fair use defense and the idea/expression dichotomy. This Article argues that the conventional wisdom no longer holds given the unprecedented expansion of copyright’s scope and cor-responding drastic diminution of the public domain in the last three …
An Integrated Perspective On The Collateral Consequences Of Criminal Convictions And Reentry Issues Faced By Formerly Incarcerated Individuals, Michael Pinard
An Integrated Perspective On The Collateral Consequences Of Criminal Convictions And Reentry Issues Faced By Formerly Incarcerated Individuals, Michael Pinard
Michael Pinard
This article examines the emergent focus on the collateral consequences of criminal convictions and the reentry of formerly incarcerated individuals. Specifically, the article details the ways in which legal scholars, policy analysts, elected officials, legal services organizations and community based organizations have begun to address these components of the criminal justice system. The article argues that these various groups have compartmentalized collateral consequences and reentry by focusing almost exclusively on one component to the exclusion of the other. In doing so, they have narrowed the lens through which to view these components, and have therefore missed opportunities to develop integrated …
Reconsidering Spousal Privileges After Crawford, R. Michael Cassidy
Reconsidering Spousal Privileges After Crawford, R. Michael Cassidy
R. Michael Cassidy
In this article the author explores how domestic violence prevention efforts have been adversely impacted by the Supreme Court’s new “testimonial” approach to the confrontation clause. Examining the Court’s trilogy of cases from Crawford to Davis and Hammon, the author argues that the introduction of certain forms of hearsay in criminal cases has been drastically limited by the court’s new originalist approach to the Sixth Amendment. The author explains how state spousal privilege statutes often present a significant barrier to obtaining live testimony from victims of domestic violence. The author then argues that state legislatures should reconsider their spousal privilege …
Ows And The Constitution, Timothy Zick
Defining Instrumentalities Of Deadly Force, Tim Longo
Defining Instrumentalities Of Deadly Force, Tim Longo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity: Further Developments In The Post-Pearson Era, Karen M. Blum
Qualified Immunity: Further Developments In The Post-Pearson Era, Karen M. Blum
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Twombly And Iqbal: The Introduction Of A Heightened Pleading Standard, Shira A. Sheindlin Honorable
Twombly And Iqbal: The Introduction Of A Heightened Pleading Standard, Shira A. Sheindlin Honorable
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Wrongful Conviction Claims Under Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Robert W. Pratt Honorable
Wrongful Conviction Claims Under Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Robert W. Pratt Honorable
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.