Law Commons^™

Hathorn V. Lovorn, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Crawford V. Board Of Education Of City Of Los Angeles, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People V. Claiborne Hardware Company, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Rogers V. Lodge, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Ford Motor Co. V. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Eeoc), Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Washington V. Seattle School District No. 1, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Velde V. National Black Police Association, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Zipes V. Trans World Airlines, Inc., Lewis Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

North Haven Board Of Education V. Bell, Lewis Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

American Tobacco Co. V. Patterson, Lewis F. Powell Jr

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Introduction, L. Lynn Hogue

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Guardianship: Overcoming The Last Hurdle To Civil Rights For The Mentally Disabled, Sheryl Dicker

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Aftermath Of The Dd Act: Is There Life After Pennhurst, The, Penelope A. Boyd

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rights For Developmentally Disabled Citizens: A Perspective For The 80s, H. Rutherford Turnbull Iii

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reviewing An Individual Habilitation Plan: A Lawyer's Guide, Marianne Bennett

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Burdens Of Pleading And Proof In Discrimination Cases: Toward A Theory Of Procedural Justice, Robert Belton

Vanderbilt Law Review

If the national policy of eliminating discrimination is to be achieved, the courts--to whom the major responsibility for effectuating this goal is delegated--must establish a coherent framework for allocating the burdens of pleading and proof that provides "a sensible, orderly way to evaluate the evidence in light of common experience as it bears on the critical question of discrimination."' The purpose of this Article, therefore, is to propose such a coherent approach to the allocation of the burdens of pleading and proof in discrimination cases. Towards this end, part II of the Article examines the definitional and operational effect of …

The Alien Tort Statute: United States Jurisdiction Over Acts Of Torture Committed Abroad, Timothy Mcdonnell

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ua21 Wku Affirmative Action Plan Volume Ii, Wku Office Of Equal Opportunity / 504 / Ada Compliance

WKU Archives Records

This volume contains information and instructions regarding goals and timetables:

• Memorandum
• Availability Data

It also contains the goals and timetables for the following units:

• College of Arts & Humanities
• College of Business Administration
• College of Education
• College of Science, Technology & Health
• Academic Services
• Academic Affairs
• Office of the President
• Business Affairs
• Student Affairs

Printed Material: Jacksonville Chapter Of American-Arab Anti-Discrimination League, Jacksonville Chapter Of American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee

Saffy Collection - All Textual Materials

First meeting of the Jacksonville Chapter of the ADC and agenda. August 12, 1981

The Proper Role Of Res Judicata And Collateral Estoppel In Title Vii Suits, Charles C. Jackson, John H. Matheson, Thomas J. Pikorski

Michigan Law Review

The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclusion principles unless Congress clearly indicates otherwise. Part II considers a number of indicators of Congress's intent, and finds no evidence to rebut the presumption that federal courts must give preclusive weight to certain state decisions. Part III then proposes general guidelines for the application of preclusion doctrines in title VII litigation.

Compensatory Damages In Federal Fair Housing Cases, Robert G. Schwemm

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The federal fair housing laws became effective in 1968. Since then, courts have often awarded damages to victims of housing discrimination, but their decisions have provided little guidance for assessing the amount of such awards. There is a great range of awards, with some courts awarding only nominal damages of $1 and others setting awards of over $20,000. Compounding the problem is the difficulty of measuring the principal element of damages claimed by most plaintiffs in fair housing cases, noneconomic emotional harm or other forms of intangible injury.

Rarely is the basis for the amount of the court's award satisfactorily …

Employment Discrimination, Susan A. Cahoon

Mercer Law Review

During 1980, the Fifth Circuit again had a full docket of employment discrimination cases. For the most part, the cases tended to turn on the particular facts at issue, and there were few pronouncements by the court of broader significance. An en banc court did decide an important question about limiting communications in class actions, and a panel of the court considered for the first time, whether there is an implied private cause of action to sue for discrimination against the handicapped under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Fifth Circuit also continued to follow a unique …

Garcia V. Gloor: Mutable Characteristics Rationale Extended To National Origin Discrimination, Dwight J. Davis

Mercer Law Review

In Garcia v. Gloor, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district court ruling that an employer's policy requiring employees to speak only English while at work did not violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibition against national origin discrimination. In so ruling, the court extended the mutable-immutable characteristics rationale that the Fifth Circuit first outlined in Willingham v. Macon Telegraph Publishing Co.

The Bloodless Revolution: The Role Of The Fifth Circuit In The Integration Of The Deep South, Frank T. Read

Mercer Law Review

On October 1, 1981, the nation's foremost civil rights tribunal will be no more. On that date, the Fifth Circuit Reorganization Act will become effective and the famous United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will be divided into two new circuits.' With the passing of the Fifth Circuit into history's dusty pages, it is appropriate to reflect on the contributions of that court in this nation's monumental struggle to desegregate the public schools of the Deep South.

On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court, in its most important decision in this century, rejected the "separate …

Chief Justice Earl Warren, Otis H. King

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justice John M. Harlan, Drew S. Days Iii

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justice Byron R. White, Charles E. Daye

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justice William O. Douglas, Wiley A. Branton

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justice William Brennan, John Doar

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justice Potter Stewart, Vincent L. Broderick

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.