Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Civil Rights and Discrimination

University of Miami Law Review

Journal

Civil rights

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

A Genealogy Of Programmatic Stop And Frisk: The Discourse-To-Practice-Circuit, Frank Rudy Cooper Oct 2018

A Genealogy Of Programmatic Stop And Frisk: The Discourse-To-Practice-Circuit, Frank Rudy Cooper

University of Miami Law Review

President Trump has called for increased use of the recently predominant policing methodology known as programmatic stop and frisk. This Article contributes to the field by identifying, defining, and discussing five key components of the practice: (1) administratively dictated (2) pervasive Terry v. Ohio stops and frisks (3) aimed at crime prevention by means of (4) data-enhanced profiles of suspects that (5) target young racial minority men.

Whereas some scholars see programmatic stop and frisk as solely the product of individual police officer bias, this Article argues for understanding how we arrived at specific police practices by analyzing three levels …


Bray V. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic: Women Under Siege, Dianne Olivia Fischer Apr 1993

Bray V. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic: Women Under Siege, Dianne Olivia Fischer

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Beyond A Black And White Reading Of Sections 1981 And 1982: Shifting The Focus From Racial Status To Racist Acts, Linda A. Lacewell, Paul A. Shelowitz Mar 1987

Beyond A Black And White Reading Of Sections 1981 And 1982: Shifting The Focus From Racial Status To Racist Acts, Linda A. Lacewell, Paul A. Shelowitz

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


In Defense Of Public Defenders: Polk County V. Dodson, Jeffrey C. Gilbert May 1982

In Defense Of Public Defenders: Polk County V. Dodson, Jeffrey C. Gilbert

University of Miami Law Review

In Polk County v. Dodson, the United States Supreme Court held that a public defender does not act under color of state law "when performing a lawyer's 'traditional functions' as counsel to a defendant in a criminal proceeding." The Court formulated a "functions" test to distinguish cases holding that public defenders act under color of state law when performing administrative tasks or when engaging in nontraditional or criminal acts. The author questions the Court's marked curtailment of indigents' access to federal courts when alleging ineffective representation by public defenders under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Moreover, the author concludes that …


Federalism And Double Jeopardy: A Study In The Frustration Of Human Rights, Harlan R. Harrison May 1963

Federalism And Double Jeopardy: A Study In The Frustration Of Human Rights, Harlan R. Harrison

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.