Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 10th Circuit (1)
- 303 Creative LLC (1)
- Civil rights plaintiffs (1)
- Exhaustion rule (1)
- First Amendment (1)
-
- First amendment (1)
- Incarcerated people (1)
- Kluge v. Brownsburg Community School Corporation (1)
- PLRA (1)
- Physical injury requirement (1)
- Prison Litigation Reform Act (1)
- Prison Policy Initiative (1)
- Same-sex wedding (1)
- Three strikes rule (1)
- Title VII (1)
- Transgender students (1)
- Virginia Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Virginia Court Reinstates Teacher Suspended For Opposing Trans Inclusion Policy, Arthur S. Leonard
Virginia Court Reinstates Teacher Suspended For Opposing Trans Inclusion Policy, Arthur S. Leonard
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Indiana Federal Court Rejects Public School Teacher’S Religious Discrimination Claim Over Misgendering Discharge, Arthur S. Leonard
Indiana Federal Court Rejects Public School Teacher’S Religious Discrimination Claim Over Misgendering Discharge, Arthur S. Leonard
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Court Rejects Web Designer’S Challenge To Colorado Anti-Discrimination Law, Arthur S. Leonard
Court Rejects Web Designer’S Challenge To Colorado Anti-Discrimination Law, Arthur S. Leonard
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Scotus Denies Review To Florist Who Refused To Serve Same-Sex Couple, Arthur S. Leonard
Scotus Denies Review To Florist Who Refused To Serve Same-Sex Couple, Arthur S. Leonard
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Slamming The Courthouse Door: 25 Years Of Evidence For Repealing The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Andrea Fenster, Margo Schlanger
Slamming The Courthouse Door: 25 Years Of Evidence For Repealing The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Andrea Fenster, Margo Schlanger
Other Publications
Twenty-five years ago today, in 1996, President Bill Clinton signed the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The “PLRA,” as it is often called, makes it much harder for incarcerated people to file and win federal civil rights lawsuits. For two-and-a-half decades, the legislation has created a double standard that limits incarcerated people’s access to the courts at all stages: it requires courts to dismiss civil rights cases from incarcerated people for minor technical reasons before even reaching the case merits, requires incarcerated people to pay filing fees that low-income people on the outside are exempt from, makes it hard to find …