Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative remedies (1)
- City charter (1)
- Civil commitment (1)
- Consent requirement (1)
- Custodial care (1)
-
- Default procedure (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Discriminatory effect (1)
- Due process (1)
- Exclusionary zoning (1)
- Fair housing (1)
- Financing bias (1)
- Involuntary confinement (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Mandatory zoning referendum (1)
- Mental illness (1)
- Parens patriae (1)
- Quid pro quo due process (1)
- Rental bias (1)
- Right to treatment (1)
- Sex discrimination (1)
- Subpoena power (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Civil Rights By Default, Barbara Kaye Besser, Charles Guerrier
Civil Rights By Default, Barbara Kaye Besser, Charles Guerrier
Cleveland State Law Review
It is the intention of this article to discuss the existing devices available to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission to compel a respondent to provide the relevant factual information requested; to point out the inadequacies of these procedures; and to propose an additional method to effectuate a speedy resolution of the controversies before the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.
O'Connor V. Donaldson: The Death Of The Quid Pro Quo Argument For A Right To Treatment, Thomas P. Bliss
O'Connor V. Donaldson: The Death Of The Quid Pro Quo Argument For A Right To Treatment, Thomas P. Bliss
Cleveland State Law Review
On June 26, 1975, the Supreme Court was confronted with the controversial issue of whether there is a constitutionally guaranteed right to treatment for nondangerous persons who have been involuntarily and civilly committed to mental institutions. The Court avoided this long advocated issue and created the potential for future litigation by holding that a state cannot constitutionally confine a nondangerous individual solely for custodial care if such person can live safely in the outside world, without a finding of more than mere mental illness. This comment will discuss the decision in terms of the most volatile and frequently urged constitutional …
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. V. City Of Eastlake: Zoning Referenda And Exclusionary Zoning, Frank J. Kundrat Jr., Stephen Bond
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. V. City Of Eastlake: Zoning Referenda And Exclusionary Zoning, Frank J. Kundrat Jr., Stephen Bond
Cleveland State Law Review
In the recent Ohio Supreme Court decision of Forest City Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Eastlake, the court stated a new principle of law in the area of referendum zoning: A municipal charter provision, which requires that any ordinance changing land use be ratified by the voters in a city-wide election, constitutes an unlawful delegation of legislative power, in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The court was, however, far from convincing either in terms of distinguishing the prior law of referendum zoning or in demonstrating the applicability of their conclusion …
Pioneering Approaches To Confront Sex Bias In Housing, Betsey Friedman
Pioneering Approaches To Confront Sex Bias In Housing, Betsey Friedman
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note will be a national review of the past experiences with and potential action in the area of sex discrimination in residential real estate transactions. Emphasis will be on sex discrimination in the rental of real property, with a brief review of the more commonly acknowledged problem of credit discrimination in home sale financing. The present suitability of available state remedies will be discussed, with an analysis of the charges filed. And, the emergence of Fair Housing Act racial litigation will be explored, with a view towards its application in sex discrimination housing cases.