Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 1988 general venue statute (2)
- Corporate venue (2)
- Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- International Shoe (2)
-
- Patent infringement (2)
- Patent infringement cases (2)
- Patent venue statute (2)
- Venue in patent infringement (2)
- Certification (1)
- Certification requirement (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Multi-claim actions (1)
- Multi-party actions (1)
- Non-certification (1)
- Ohio Rule 54(B) (1)
- Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure 54(B) (1)
- Rule interpretation (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The 1988 Revision Of 28 U.S.C. 1391(C): Corporate Venue Is Now Equivalent To In Personam Jurisdiction Effects On Civil Actions For Patent Infringement, Thomas W. Adams
The 1988 Revision Of 28 U.S.C. 1391(C): Corporate Venue Is Now Equivalent To In Personam Jurisdiction Effects On Civil Actions For Patent Infringement, Thomas W. Adams
Cleveland State Law Review
Venue in federal cases is controlled by the general venue statute unless there exists an applicable special venue statute that attaches to the particular cause of action under consideration. This note is concerned with the section of the general venue statute applicable to corporate defendants and its interaction with the special venue statute for civil actions in patent infringement cases ("patent venue statute"). As a first step in the discussion of venue, it is necessary to go back in history over 200 years. This note reviews the history of venue, both generally and in cases of patent infringement, the historical …
The 1988 Revision Of 28 U.S.C. 1391(C): Corporate Venue Is Now Equivalent To In Personam Jurisdiction Effects On Civil Actions For Patent Infringement, Thomas W. Adams
The 1988 Revision Of 28 U.S.C. 1391(C): Corporate Venue Is Now Equivalent To In Personam Jurisdiction Effects On Civil Actions For Patent Infringement, Thomas W. Adams
Cleveland State Law Review
Venue in federal cases is controlled by the general venue statute unless there exists an applicable special venue statute that attaches to the particular cause of action under consideration. This note is concerned with the section of the general venue statute applicable to corporate defendants and its interaction with the special venue statute for civil actions in patent infringement cases ("patent venue statute"). As a first step in the discussion of venue, it is necessary to go back in history over 200 years. This note reviews the history of venue, both generally and in cases of patent infringement, the historical …
The Application And Misapplication Of Ohio Rule Of Civil Procedure 54(B), Diane S. Leung
The Application And Misapplication Of Ohio Rule Of Civil Procedure 54(B), Diane S. Leung
Cleveland State Law Review
The rules of civil procedure, seemingly straightforward, can be misinterpreted due to attorney inattentiveness. One rule which has suffered and still is suffering from misinterpretation and misapplication is Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure 54(B), judgment upon multiple claims or involving multiple parties, the subject of this note. The following discussion, an analysis of Rule 54(B), will attempt to accomplish several tasks. First, the note will briefly describe the history, nature, and purpose of the rule. Secondly, it will analyze the major aspects and requirements of Rule 54(B). The analysis will emphasize the facets of the rule which have often been …