Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil procedure (3)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (3)
- Federal courts (2)
- Law and technology (2)
- Abstention (1)
-
- Appointed Counsel (1)
- Article i (1)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (1)
- Civil Custody Suit (1)
- Civil litigation (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Congress (1)
- Congruence and proportionality (1)
- Custody (1)
- Diversity (1)
- E-discovery (1)
- Electronic discovery (1)
- Eleventh Amendment (1)
- FRCP (1)
- False claims act (1)
- Federal Rulemaking Committees (1)
- Federal litigation (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Hospice (1)
- Indigent Parents (1)
- Judges (1)
- Legal Custody (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Ohio (1)
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Toothless Tcpa: An Analysis Of Article Iii Standing, Personal Jurisdiction, And The Disjuncture Problem’S Impact On The Efficacy Of The Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Sebastian W. Johnson
A Toothless Tcpa: An Analysis Of Article Iii Standing, Personal Jurisdiction, And The Disjuncture Problem’S Impact On The Efficacy Of The Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Sebastian W. Johnson
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Missing Links: Why Hyperlinks Must Be Treated As Attachments In Electronic Discovery, Lea Malani Bays, Stuart A. Davidson
The Missing Links: Why Hyperlinks Must Be Treated As Attachments In Electronic Discovery, Lea Malani Bays, Stuart A. Davidson
University of Cincinnati Law Review
This Article sheds light on a unique but centrally important “twenty-first century” issue involving electronic discovery in federal civil litigation that is just beginning to percolate in federal district courts. Historically, courts have held that a document attached to or enclosed with another document must be produced together when produced in response to a discovery request, as that is how the document was “kept in the usual course of business” and how it is “ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form,” as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have required for decades. Today, parties are pushing back on whether …
The Eleventh Amendment And Nondiverse Suits Against States, Collin Hong
The Eleventh Amendment And Nondiverse Suits Against States, Collin Hong
University of Cincinnati Law Review
Since Hans v. Louisiana (1890), the Supreme Court has maintained that the Eleventh Amendment protects states from suits by plaintiffs who are citizens of other states and by citizens of that state, despite the text of the Eleventh Amendment specifying that only suits from citizens of other states are barred. Scholars have noted that what therefore protects the states from suits against their own citizens is not the Eleventh Amendment, but rather a common-law immunity that existed between nations at the founding. That immunity applied both to states and to foreign nations. This article argues that just as Congress has …
The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: The Case For Putting It To Work, Not To Rest, Bradford Higdon
The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: The Case For Putting It To Work, Not To Rest, Bradford Higdon
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Objective Falsehood: Liability Under The False Claims Act For Hospice Providers, Sebastian West
Proof Of Objective Falsehood: Liability Under The False Claims Act For Hospice Providers, Sebastian West
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Parity As Comparative Capacity: A New Empirics Of The Parity Debate, Meredith R. Aska Mcbride
Parity As Comparative Capacity: A New Empirics Of The Parity Debate, Meredith R. Aska Mcbride
University of Cincinnati Law Review
In 1977, Burt Neuborne published an article in the Harvard Law Review proclaiming that parity was a “myth”—that state courts could not be trusted to enforce federal constitutional rights. For the next 15 years, the question of parity (the equivalence of state and federal courts in adjudicating federal causes of action) was at the forefront of federal courts scholarship. But in the early 1990s, the parity debate ground to a halt after important commentators proclaimed it an empirical question that, paradoxically, could not be answered by any existing empirical methods. This article argues that proposition was unfounded at the time …
Debunking Twombly/Iqbal: Plausibility Is More Than Plausible In Ohio And Other States, Matthew Marino
Debunking Twombly/Iqbal: Plausibility Is More Than Plausible In Ohio And Other States, Matthew Marino
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Standing Up For Consumers: Whether Third Party Payors Can Establish Standing To Sue Against Drug Manufacturers Under Civil Rico, Brianna Vollman
Standing Up For Consumers: Whether Third Party Payors Can Establish Standing To Sue Against Drug Manufacturers Under Civil Rico, Brianna Vollman
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seize The Day: Renewed Hope For The Permissibility Of In Rem Counterclaims Against The United States Government After The Fifth Circuit's Substituted Opinion In $4,480,466.16?, Evan Gildenblatt
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Injured By A Text: Article Iii Standing For Tcpa Texting Claims, Quinn Marker
Injured By A Text: Article Iii Standing For Tcpa Texting Claims, Quinn Marker
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lawyers On Auction - Protecting Class Members, Ittai Paldor
Lawyers On Auction - Protecting Class Members, Ittai Paldor
University of Cincinnati Law Review
The inadequacy of class settlements plagues mass litigation. Virtually all class actions settle, but a plethora of case law and academic writings shows that class attorneys often walk away from these settlements with a hefty fee, while class members receive illusory benefits. Class counsel may intentionally sell out class members by agreeing to a suboptimal settlement in return for increased fees. Class counsel may also genuinely miscalculate the best attainable settlement. In both cases, the mechanisms currently in place to protect class members—mainly court oversight—fail miserably.
This Article develops a simple solution: once a settlement is reached, appointment as class …
Monopoly And Monopsony: Antitrust Standing, Injury, And Damages, Roger D. Blair, Tirza J. Angerhofer
Monopoly And Monopsony: Antitrust Standing, Injury, And Damages, Roger D. Blair, Tirza J. Angerhofer
University of Cincinnati Law Review
This article examines the economic consequences of collusion in both the output market and one of the input markets. It examines the results of sequential collusion, which leads to complications and inconsistencies in measuring antitrust damages. It also examines simultaneous collusion in both the input and output markets. Ultimately, the profit maximizing equilibrium is identical but there are complications along the way to the final collusive equilibrium. The article explores the private plaintiff problems involving antitrust standing, proving antitrust injury, and estimating antitrust damages.
Please Remain Standing: Using Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(D) Supplemental Pleading To Cure Defects In Standing, Carson Miller
Please Remain Standing: Using Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(D) Supplemental Pleading To Cure Defects In Standing, Carson Miller
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Loss Of Legal Custody Is Like An Indeterminate Prison Sentence: Ohio's Elimination Of Indigent Parents' Right To Court Appointed Counsel In Civil Custody Suits, Renee Brunett
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Anti-Plaintiff Pending Amendments To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure And The Pro-Defendant Composition Of The Federal Rulemaking Committees, Patricia W. Moore
The Anti-Plaintiff Pending Amendments To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure And The Pro-Defendant Composition Of The Federal Rulemaking Committees, Patricia W. Moore
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.