Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to appellate review (1)
- Admission of evidence in appellate procedures (1)
- Appellate vs. common and civil law (1)
- Arkansa Civil Justive Reform Act (1)
- Arkansas Amendment 80; circuit courts; subject matter jurisdiction; chancery jurisdiction; plaintiff legal and equitable claims; equitable defense raised to legal claim; equitable claim and legal counterclaim; declaratory relief; procedural device available only in equity; right to jury trial after merger (1)
-
- Arkansas torts (1)
- Citizens' rights to be free from government abuse (1)
- Civil juries (1)
- Civil liability; collection agencies; debt collectors; consumer protection; Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; FDCPA; regulation of debt collectors; FDCPA coverage; liability statute; unauthorized practice of law; champerty and maintenance; (1)
- Civil rights litigation (1)
- Comparative fault doctrine (1)
- Constitutional law; municipal liability; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; § 1983 suits; municipal immunity; (1)
- Employer liability for sexual harassment; vicarious liability; Faragher v. City of Boca Raton; doctrinal accounts; normative accounts; descriptive accounts; women's coping strategies for sexual harassment; the assertiveness continuum response; internally or externally focused responsive strategies; (1)
- Endangered Species Act; zone of interest test for standing; standing under citizen suit provision of the ESA; standing under the citizen suit provision of the Administrative Procedures Act; constitutional theories of standing; prudential rules of standing; (1)
- Freedom of Information Act; FOIA; Arkansas Public Service Commission; working papers exemption; (1)
- Functions of appellate review (1)
- Goff v. Harold Ives Trucking Inc. (1)
- Government's right to be free from frivolous lawsuits (1)
- Hope v. Pelzer (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Inc. v. Ellerth; reasons for failure to report harassment; (1)
- Judgment as a matter of law (1)
- Mason v. Wal-Mart; tortious interference; tension between competitiveness and protection contractual relationships; defendant's liability; burden on plaintiff to show conduct improper; (1)
- Multiple tortfeasor (1)
- N.A. v. Murray Guard (1)
- NationsBank (1)
- Preservation of evidence (1)
- Prosecutorial rights of appeal (1)
- Qualified immunity (1)
- Riddell v. Little (1)
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Right To Appeal In Comparative Perspective, Dražan Djukić
The Right To Appeal In Comparative Perspective, Dražan Djukić
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Appellate procedures regarding the most serious crimes under domestic law are, in general, conducted differently in common law and civil law systems. This article reviews the differences concerning the primary facets of such proceedings, namely prosecutorial rights of appeal, access to appellate review, the scope of appellate review, the admission of additional evidence, appellate decisionmaking powers, and the functions of appellate review. It then explains that these differences result from dissimilar decisionmaking processes, degrees of adherence to the search for the truth, and sources of law.
Spoliation Of Evidence: Why This Evidentiary Concept Should Not Be Transformed Into Separate Causes Of Action, Jason B. Hendren
Spoliation Of Evidence: Why This Evidentiary Concept Should Not Be Transformed Into Separate Causes Of Action, Jason B. Hendren
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity After Hope V. Pelzer: Is "Clearly Established" Any More Clear?, Leah Chavis
Qualified Immunity After Hope V. Pelzer: Is "Clearly Established" Any More Clear?, Leah Chavis
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sizing Up A Multi-Party Tortfeasor Suit In Arkansas: A Tale Of Two Laws—How Fault Is, And Should Be, Distributed, Joseph R. Falasco
Sizing Up A Multi-Party Tortfeasor Suit In Arkansas: A Tale Of Two Laws—How Fault Is, And Should Be, Distributed, Joseph R. Falasco
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Right To Trial By Jury In Arkansas After Merger Of Law And Equity, John J. Watkins
The Right To Trial By Jury In Arkansas After Merger Of Law And Equity, John J. Watkins
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Using Evidence Of Women's Stories In Sexual Harassment Cases, Theresa M. Beiner
Using Evidence Of Women's Stories In Sexual Harassment Cases, Theresa M. Beiner
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tort Law—Spoliators Beware, But Fear Not An Independent Civil Suit. Goff V. Harold Ives Trucking Co., 342 Ark. 143, 27 S.W.3d 387 (2000)., Margaret A. Egan
Tort Law—Spoliators Beware, But Fear Not An Independent Civil Suit. Goff V. Harold Ives Trucking Co., 342 Ark. 143, 27 S.W.3d 387 (2000)., Margaret A. Egan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Employer Liability For Sexual Harassment - Normative, Descriptive, And Doctrinal Interactions: A Reply To Professors Beiner And Bisom-Rapp, Linda Hamilton Krieger
Employer Liability For Sexual Harassment - Normative, Descriptive, And Doctrinal Interactions: A Reply To Professors Beiner And Bisom-Rapp, Linda Hamilton Krieger
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fixing Watches With Sledgehammers: The Questionable Embrace Of Employee Sexual Harassment Training By The Legal Profession, Susan Bisom-Rapp
Fixing Watches With Sledgehammers: The Questionable Embrace Of Employee Sexual Harassment Training By The Legal Profession, Susan Bisom-Rapp
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Power Of A Federal Appellate Court To Direct Entry Of Judgment As A Matter Of Law: Reflections On Weisgram V. Marley Co., Robert A. Ragazzo
The Power Of A Federal Appellate Court To Direct Entry Of Judgment As A Matter Of Law: Reflections On Weisgram V. Marley Co., Robert A. Ragazzo
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Federal district court judges have several mechanisms for controlling civil jury functions. One mechanism is the entry of judgment as a matter of law. Federal appellate courts are able to reverse and direct entry of judgment as a matter of law. This article examines the appropriateness of such authority.
Civil Liability Under The Fdcpa For Unauthorized Practice Of Law, Stephen J. Maggio, Michael A. Maggio
Civil Liability Under The Fdcpa For Unauthorized Practice Of Law, Stephen J. Maggio, Michael A. Maggio
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tort Law—Tortious Interference With Contract: The Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Who Has The Burden And What They Have To Prove. Mason V. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 333 Ark. 3, 969 S.W.2d 160 (1998)., Odette Woods
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Torts—Dramshop Liability In Arkansas—Illegal Sales Of Liquor To Minors May Expose Alcohol Vendors To Expensive Liability. Shannon V. Wilson, 329 Ark. 143, 947 S.W.2d 349 (1997)., Dustin Blake Mcdaniel
Torts—Dramshop Liability In Arkansas—Illegal Sales Of Liquor To Minors May Expose Alcohol Vendors To Expensive Liability. Shannon V. Wilson, 329 Ark. 143, 947 S.W.2d 349 (1997)., Dustin Blake Mcdaniel
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Endangered Species Act: Standing To Sue. Bennett V. Spear, 117 S. Ct. 1154 (1997)., R. Margaret Dobson
Endangered Species Act: Standing To Sue. Bennett V. Spear, 117 S. Ct. 1154 (1997)., R. Margaret Dobson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Single Hiring Decisions And Municipal Entities: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Safeguard Against Municipal Liability Under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Board Of The County Comm'rs V. Brown, 117 S. Ct. 1382 (1997)., J. Matthew Mauldin
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proposed Arkansas Model Fraud Jury Instructions (Unofficial Working Draft), Charles D. Harrison, Roger D. Rowe, William A. Waddell Jr.
Proposed Arkansas Model Fraud Jury Instructions (Unofficial Working Draft), Charles D. Harrison, Roger D. Rowe, William A. Waddell Jr.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proposed Arkansas Model Contract Jury Instructions (Unofficial Preliminary Draft For Comments), William A. Waddell Jr., Matthew Horan, Stanley Rauls, Steven Rowell
Proposed Arkansas Model Contract Jury Instructions (Unofficial Preliminary Draft For Comments), William A. Waddell Jr., Matthew Horan, Stanley Rauls, Steven Rowell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Law—Freedom Of Information Act—"Working Papers" Exemption Applies Not Only To Officeholders Personally But To Staff Members And Private Consultants As Well, Robert William Schroeder Iii
Public Law—Freedom Of Information Act—"Working Papers" Exemption Applies Not Only To Officeholders Personally But To Staff Members And Private Consultants As Well, Robert William Schroeder Iii
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.