Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Business Organizations Law

Journal

Cleveland State Law Review

Personal holding company

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Some Problems In Liquidating Personal Holding Companies, Elliott H. Kajan, Martin C. Spector Jan 1965

Some Problems In Liquidating Personal Holding Companies, Elliott H. Kajan, Martin C. Spector

Cleveland State Law Review

Ordinarily, distributions by a personal holding company qualify for the dividends paid deduction only if they are "dividends" under section 316. However, certain distributions in liquidation may also qualify. These liquidating distributions of a personal holding company are divided into two categories: (1) Distributions to the extent of earnings and profits for the taxable year (computed without regard to capital losses) made in complete liquidation of the corporation occurring within 24 months after the adoption of the plan of liquidation; and (2) distributions in liquidation properly chargeable to earnings and profits accumulated after February 28, 1913.


Corporate Employee Tax Status For The Professional Man, Carmen A. Stavole Jan 1962

Corporate Employee Tax Status For The Professional Man, Carmen A. Stavole

Cleveland State Law Review

Professional associations (i.e., corporations) have been specifically authorized by several state legislatures recently, contrary to the old rule that practice of a learned profession by a corporation is forbidden. Among these states are Connecticut, Illinois, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The purpose is to make available to professional men the tax advantages of corporate employee status.


Corporate Employee Tax Status For The Professional Man, Carmen A. Stavole Jan 1962

Corporate Employee Tax Status For The Professional Man, Carmen A. Stavole

Cleveland State Law Review

Professional associations (i.e., corporations) have been specifically authorized by several state legislatures recently, contrary to the old rule that practice of a learned profession by a corporation is forbidden. Among these states are Connecticut, Illinois, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The purpose is to make available to professional men the tax advantages of corporate employee status.