Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Board fiduciary duties (1)
- Capital formation (1)
- Caremark/oversight duties (1)
- Caribbean (1)
- Clawback (1)
-
- Colonialism (1)
- Corporate charters (1)
- Corporate compliance (1)
- Corporate crime (1)
- Corporate reporting (1)
- DOJ (1)
- Development strategy (1)
- ESG (1)
- Enlightened capitalism (1)
- Future of work (1)
- GRI (1)
- HCM (1)
- Human capital management (1)
- Human resource management (1)
- Investor protection (1)
- JOBS Act (1)
- Materiality (1)
- Offshore financial centers (1)
- Penalties (1)
- Political sociology (1)
- Principles-based disclosure (1)
- Public company regulation (1)
- Public-private divide (1)
- Recidivism prevention (1)
- Reg. S-K (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Breakdown Of The Public–Private Divide In Securities Law: Causes, Consequences, And Reforms, George S. Georgiev
The Breakdown Of The Public–Private Divide In Securities Law: Causes, Consequences, And Reforms, George S. Georgiev
Faculty Articles
As a regulatory scheme, U.S. securities law has traditionally been designed around a set of lines—the “public–private divide”—which separate public companies, public capital, and public markets, from private companies, private capital, and private markets. Until the early 2000s, the lines were successful in establishing two largely coherent legal realms—a highly regulated public realm and a lightly regulated private realm. A series of bold and often-inconsistent reforms between 2002 and 2020, however, have transformed this longstanding regime into a low-friction system wherein public capital flows to both public and private companies, private capital is ever more abundant, and firms can effectively …
The Human Capital Management Movement In U.S. Corporate Law, George S. Georgiev
The Human Capital Management Movement In U.S. Corporate Law, George S. Georgiev
Faculty Articles
Corporations cannot exist without workers, yet workers are not part of the formal or informal governance structures established by U.S. corporate law. Commentators and policymakers have bemoaned this state of affairs for decades, to little avail. Since the mid-2010s, however, a concept related to workers, human capital management (HCM), has become an increasingly prominent part of U.S. corporate governance. HCM is premised on the notion that workers can be viewed as “assets” and ought to be managed just as carefully as firms manage physical and capital assets. In practice, HCM is an expansive concept that has been used to refer …
Regulatory Competition And State Capacity, Martin W. Sybblis
Regulatory Competition And State Capacity, Martin W. Sybblis
Faculty Articles
This Article explores an underlying tension in the regulatory competition literature regarding why some jurisdictions are more attractive to firms than others. It pays special attention to offshore financial centers (OFCs). OFCs court the business of nonresidents, offer business friendly regulatory environments, and provide for minimal, if any, taxation on their customers. On the one extreme, OFCs are theorized as merely products of legislative capture— thereby lacking any meaningful agency of their own. On the other hand, OFCs are conceptualized as well-governed jurisdictions that attract investment because of the high quality of their laws and legal institutions—indicating some ability to …
Follow-Up Enforcement, Andrew K. Jennings
Follow-Up Enforcement, Andrew K. Jennings
Faculty Articles
Firms sometimes break the law. When they do, a host of government agencies have power to bring enforcement actions against them, which serve to punish past wrongs, compensate victims, disgorge unlawful gains, deter others, and prevent recidivism. Each of these purposes but one—preventing recidivism—is either met or not once the case reaches settlement. Whether recidivism will occur, however, remains uncertain at the time a case is settled. In light of that uncertainty, this Article takes a critical look at how enforcers currently address recidivism prevention—what it dubs the “clawback” approach—under which defendant firms receive penalty credit today in exchange for …