Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Bankruptcy - Suspension Of State Statutes Regulating General Assignments
Bankruptcy - Suspension Of State Statutes Regulating General Assignments
Michigan Law Review
An insolvent debtor made a voluntary assignment of. all his property to the defendants for the benefit of his creditors. The plaintiff, a nonassenting creditor, brought garnishment proceedings against the defendants, contending that the state statute governing general assignments had been suspended by the National Bankruptcy Act. The Wisconsin Supreme Court was of the opinion that only that portion of the Act which provides for a discharge of the assignor from his debts was suspended. On appeal to the United-States Supreme Court the decision was affirmed. Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co., 287 U. S. 518, 53 Sup. …
Receivers - Consent Receivership Not Allowed In Michigan
Receivers - Consent Receivership Not Allowed In Michigan
Michigan Law Review
A general creditor filed a bill alleging that the defendant corporation's assets as shown by its books have a value in excess of its indebtedness but that it cannot meet its current obligations although its assets, when converted into money would be sufficient to meet them and continue its business; that several suits have been instituted by defendant's creditors and that if executions are issued and levies made, defendant will be compelled to cease operations and losses will be suffered by all of defendant's creditors, whereas, if a receiver is appointed to operate its business their claims may be paid …
Bankruptcy -- Fraudulent Conveyances -- Dealings Between One-Man Corporations Owned By One Person
Bankruptcy -- Fraudulent Conveyances -- Dealings Between One-Man Corporations Owned By One Person
Michigan Law Review
H was president of corporations A, B, and C. Through his control of B and C he secured personal advances approximating $600,000. This money he loaned as personal funds to A which through its directors and officers, in their official capacities, was aware of the source of the funds though not of the exact amounts nor of the fact of unlawful diversion. F bank held certain matured promissory notes of B upon which H had become obligated as guarantor. B and H were in financial difficulties and F bank threatened to throw H into bankruptcy.A thereupon, and …