Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 21 of 21
Full-Text Articles in Law
Bankruptcy & The Underwater Home: A Case For Real Property Redemption, David Sheinfeld
Bankruptcy & The Underwater Home: A Case For Real Property Redemption, David Sheinfeld
Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review
Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code exists to satisfy the claims of creditors and preserve an economic “fresh start” for the debtor after bankruptcy. In exchange for surrendering her property to the trustee to have it monetized (i.e., sold), the debtor receives a discharge of her debts and an injunction against future creditor in personam actions to recover them. However, the in personam injunction is insufficient to protect consumer debtors who are in default on mortgages encumbering underwater homes because the creditor’s in rem rights remain; after the conclusion of the case, the creditor can continue foreclosure proceedings, which …
Grinding Gears: Meshing Maine Mortgage Foreclosure Law And The Bankruptcy Code, Daniel L. Cummings
Grinding Gears: Meshing Maine Mortgage Foreclosure Law And The Bankruptcy Code, Daniel L. Cummings
Maine Law Review
In Maine interesting and unresolved questions often arise when a mortgagor files for bankruptcy after a judgment of foreclosure has been entered in state court but before a foreclosure sale has occurred. Specifically, what rights does the mortgagor have in the real property? And are the mortgagee's subsequent steps to complete the sale barred by the automatic stay of the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”)? These questions are made more difficult because Maine is a title theory state and because the foreclosure sale occurs after the expiration of the statutory redemption period rather than, as in most states, before it. Because a …
Grinding Gears: Meshing Maine Mortgage Foreclosure Law And The Bankruptcy Code, Daniel L. Cummings
Grinding Gears: Meshing Maine Mortgage Foreclosure Law And The Bankruptcy Code, Daniel L. Cummings
Maine Law Review
In Maine interesting and unresolved questions often arise when a mortgagor files for bankruptcy after a judgment of foreclosure has been entered in state court but before a foreclosure sale has occurred. Specifically, what rights does the mortgagor have in the real property? And are the mortgagee's subsequent steps to complete the sale barred by the automatic stay of the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”)? These questions are made more difficult because Maine is a title theory state and because the foreclosure sale occurs after the expiration of the statutory redemption period rather than, as in most states, before it. Because a …
Screened Out Of Housing: The Impact Of Misleading Tenant Screening Reports And The Potential For Criminal Expungement As A Model For Effectively Sealing Evictions, Katelyn Polk
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
Having an eviction record “blacklists” tenants from finding future housing. Even renters with mere eviction filings—not eviction orders—on their records face the harsh collateral consequences of eviction. This Note argues that eviction records should be sealed at filing and only released into the public record if a landlord prevails in court. Juvenile record expungement mechanisms in Illinois serve as a model for one way to protect people with eviction records. Recent updates to the Illinois juvenile expungement process provided for the automatic expungement of certain records and strengthened the confidentiality protections of juvenile records. Illinois protects juvenile records because it …
Tipping The Scales: Balancing The Weight Of Equity With Loan Rescissions In Bankruptcy, Corey Scott Hadley
Tipping The Scales: Balancing The Weight Of Equity With Loan Rescissions In Bankruptcy, Corey Scott Hadley
Maine Law Review
Prior to the passage of the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA) in 1968, consumers were vulnerable to many deceptive practices employed by creditors when participating in loan transactions. Following the passage of TILA, it was the hope of Congress that consumers would now have the tools necessary to fend off predatory or deceptive credit terms buried within the fine print of a loan agreement. One of the options afforded to consumers facing a suspect loan agreement is the right to rescission. When lenders, creditors, and other parties in the credit transaction “fail to provide the consumer with proper disclosures about the loan …
Banks, Break-Ins, And Bad Actors In Mortgage Foreclosure, Christopher K. Odinet
Banks, Break-Ins, And Bad Actors In Mortgage Foreclosure, Christopher K. Odinet
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Changing Practice Of Bankruptcy Law: An Analysis Of How Bankruptcy Practice Has Changed In The Last Decade, Michael Goldstein, Samantha Einhorn, Jill L. Phillips
The Changing Practice Of Bankruptcy Law: An Analysis Of How Bankruptcy Practice Has Changed In The Last Decade, Michael Goldstein, Samantha Einhorn, Jill L. Phillips
University of Massachusetts Law Review
The practice of bankruptcy law has changed drastically over the last decade. An attorney starting out in the field in 2009 faces different issue than one who began in 1999. However, it’s not just the issues that come up with clients that make the practice so different, but the law of bankruptcy itself has changed. The economic downturn of the last eighteen months has changed the way the public views bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005 and In re Bateman, a case decided in 2008, altered the landscape of bankruptcy practice forever. This article will walk through a …
Mortgage Wars Episode V - The Empiricist Strikes Back (Or Out): A Reply To Professor Levitin's Response , Mark S. Scarberry
Mortgage Wars Episode V - The Empiricist Strikes Back (Or Out): A Reply To Professor Levitin's Response , Mark S. Scarberry
Pepperdine Law Review
Professor Adam Levitin has responded to my recent symposium article critiquing proposed congressional legislation that would allow modification (including strip down) of home mortgages in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. A portion of my Critique criticized his empirical studies concerning the likely effect of the proposed legislation on mortgage interest rates and availability, and also criticized the arguments he has made in support of the proposed legislation. The Critique did note, however, that the insight involved in conceiving of such empirical studies was impressive. Surprisingly, Professor Levitin’s Response fails to deal with the substantial case authority discussed in my Critique. He treats …
Back To The Future With Chapter 13: A Response To Professor Scarberry, Adam J. Levitin
Back To The Future With Chapter 13: A Response To Professor Scarberry, Adam J. Levitin
Pepperdine Law Review
Professor Mark Scarberry has put forth a formidable critique of my empirical study of mortgage market sensitivity to bankruptcy modification risk. As this response shows, however, his critique does not hold up under scrutiny. Professor Scarberry argues that my study design is invalid because, as he reads the current state of the law, cramdown is virtually impossible. Therefore, he contends, we should not expect markets to exhibit sensitivity to cramdown risk, so no policy conclusions can be derived from my finding of market insensitivity. Regrettably, Professor Scarberry overreads the state of the law. The law is in fact unsettled, and …
A Critique Of Congressional Proposals To Permit Modification Of Home Mortgages In Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, Mark S. Scarberry
A Critique Of Congressional Proposals To Permit Modification Of Home Mortgages In Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, Mark S. Scarberry
Pepperdine Law Review
Proposed amendments to the Bankruptcy Code permitting strip down of under secured home mortgages to the court-determined value of the homes and other modifications of home mortgages in Chapter 13 would substantially alter the risk characteristics of home mortgages, with likely substantial effects on future mortgage interest rates and future mortgage availability. Thus, the future societal cost of such a change in the law likely would be large. This article explains and supports that thesis, primarily on the ground that the proposed changes would leave mortgage holders with all of the future downside risk in the real property market while …
The Case For "Cramdown": Eliminating The Practical And Ideological Barriers To Pure Mortgage Modification, Peter J. Leo
The Case For "Cramdown": Eliminating The Practical And Ideological Barriers To Pure Mortgage Modification, Peter J. Leo
University of Miami Business Law Review
No abstract provided.
Financial Stability Is A Volume Business: A Comment On 'The Legal Infrastructure Of Ex Post Consumer Debtor Protections', Anna Gelpern
Financial Stability Is A Volume Business: A Comment On 'The Legal Infrastructure Of Ex Post Consumer Debtor Protections', Anna Gelpern
Fordham Urban Law Journal
In this response to Professor Melissa B. Jacoby's "The Legal Infrastructure of Ex Post Consumer Debtor Protections," the author expands the scope of the household debt discussion beyond the consumer level and examines the effect that a fragmented infrastructure for legal service delivery can have on financial stability nationwide.
The Legal Infrastructure Of Ex Post Consumer Debtor Protections, Melissa B. Jacoby
The Legal Infrastructure Of Ex Post Consumer Debtor Protections, Melissa B. Jacoby
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article reviews the legal infrastructure of tools that protect debtors’ assets or income, or that enable debtors to resolve secured credit problems during ordinary times (e.g., not specific crisis interventions). Part I divides consumer protection tools into functional categories: protection of assets and future income, and retention of property subject to a security interest in default. Part II identifies the location of similar tools in federal law, uniform state law, and non-uniform state law. Part III examines implications of this divided system, with a special focus on the bundling of debtor protections and the role of intermediaries. This discussion …
Bankruptcy Law - Bfp V. Imperial Savings And Loan Association: Resolving The "Reasonably Equivalent Value" Standard In Avoiding Foreclosure Sales, Kevin F. Kilty
Golden Gate University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Cra: A Welcome Anomaly In The Foreclosure Crisis, Warren W. Traiger
The Cra: A Welcome Anomaly In The Foreclosure Crisis, Warren W. Traiger
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Tax Treatment Of Cancelled Interest And Penalties On Consumer Debt, Richard C.E. Beck
The Tax Treatment Of Cancelled Interest And Penalties On Consumer Debt, Richard C.E. Beck
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bfp V. Resolution Trust Corporation: Supreme Court Shifts Focus Onto State Law In Ruling On Mortgage Foreclosure Sales, Audy M. Perry Jr.
Bfp V. Resolution Trust Corporation: Supreme Court Shifts Focus Onto State Law In Ruling On Mortgage Foreclosure Sales, Audy M. Perry Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bankruptcy - Reorganization - Nature Of Farmer-Debtor's Right To Adjudication Under Section 75 (S), Louis C. Andrews, Jr.
Bankruptcy - Reorganization - Nature Of Farmer-Debtor's Right To Adjudication Under Section 75 (S), Louis C. Andrews, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a farmer, filed his original petition May 3, 1934, under section 74 of the Bankruptcy Act. Eleven months later he amended his petition, seeking relief under section 75 (a)-(r). Until March 2, 1940, no progress was made, and at that time the plaintiff sought adjudication under subsection (s). The district court entered an order that the petition be denied and the mortgagee's title recognized. The circuit court of appeals affirmed, stating that the petitioner had an affirmative duty to proceed diligently in obtaining a composition and extension agreement under subsections (a)-( r). Held, reversed. The benefits of section …
Bankruptcy - Corporate Reorganization - "Good Faith" In Presenting Petitions For Reorganization Proceedings, Arthur P. Boynton
Bankruptcy - Corporate Reorganization - "Good Faith" In Presenting Petitions For Reorganization Proceedings, Arthur P. Boynton
Michigan Law Review
Reorganization proceedings for corporations are now provided for in chapter ten of the recently enacted Chandler Act, which supersedes the provisions of 77B. This legislation, designed to aid corporations which are insolvent or unable to meet their debts as they mature, is available to all commercial corporations except municipal, insurance, and banking corporations and railroad corporations authorized to file a petition under section 77 upon the proper showing. Sections 130 and 131 enumerate the necessary requirements of any petition filed for the purpose of obtaining reorganization. However, the most important prerequisite to this relief, from the standpoint of difficulty in …
Evasion Of Mortgage Moratoria By Prosecution Of Personal Remedies, Gordon B. Wheeler, Edgar N. Durfee
Evasion Of Mortgage Moratoria By Prosecution Of Personal Remedies, Gordon B. Wheeler, Edgar N. Durfee
Michigan Law Review
For reasons political, social and economic which have never been fully analyzed, the moratory legislation of the last five years has shown special favor to the debtor whose obligation is secured by mortgage of land, and this legislation is faintly echoed in moratory decisions which have no direct statutory foundation. Granted that contracts have sometimes received similar treatment, that banks and insurance companies have also enjoyed indulgence, and that the new chapters of the Bankruptcy Act extend asylum to all and sundry, yet the mortgage is so far favored that the word "moratorium" brings to mind this case before all …
Corporations - Reorganization Under Section 77 B - Right Of Mortgage Trustee To Vote To Exclusion Of Bondholders
Michigan Law Review
The trustee under a mortgage bond issue which was in default with foreclosure pending, sought to vote to the exclusion of the bondholders on a proposed plan for reorganization in a voluntary proceeding by the corporation debtor pursuant to Section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act. The trust indenture authorized the trustee on default to enforce the security by appropriate proceedings, and the individual bondholders were specifically forbidden to sue. The indenture also gave a majority in interest of the bondholders power by an instrument in writing to direct the procedure of the trustee or to remove him. There was no …