Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Banking and Finance Law

Michigan Law Review

Journal

1939

Promissory notes

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Criminal Law And Procedure - Interpretation Of Statute, Michigan Law Review Dec 1939

Criminal Law And Procedure - Interpretation Of Statute, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Convicted of the statutory crime of falsely uttering a bank check, defendant appealed on the ground that the instrument in question was a promissory note. It was in appearance and form a check except for the substitution of "will pay" for "pay" and the addition of the words "payable at" before the name of the bank. Held, affirmed, the court construing the instrument as a check. State v. Doudna, (Iowa, 1939) 284 N. W. 113.


Mortgages - Limitation Of Actions - Deficiency Decree On Basis Of Covenant In Mortgage When Action On Note Barred, Donald M. Swope Jun 1939

Mortgages - Limitation Of Actions - Deficiency Decree On Basis Of Covenant In Mortgage When Action On Note Barred, Donald M. Swope

Michigan Law Review

Defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note and a mortgage securing it. The mortgage contained a covenant to pay $10,000 (the principal amount of the note) "according to the terms of a certain promissory note bearing even date herewith." Upon foreclosure it was held, three judges dissenting, that the mortgagee was entitled to a deficiency decree notwithstanding action on the note was barred by the statute of limitations. Guardian Depositors Corporation of Detroit v. Savage, 287 Mich. 193,283 N. W. 26 (1938).


Bills And Notes - Effect Of Statute Of Limitations On Demand Certificates Of Deposit And Certified Checks, Michigan Law Review Jun 1939

Bills And Notes - Effect Of Statute Of Limitations On Demand Certificates Of Deposit And Certified Checks, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff sued on a certificate of deposit and a certified check, the former being issued by the defendant bank in 1905 and the latter being certified in 1919. Both were negotiated in 1937 and presented for payment the next day. Defendant pleaded the ten year statute of limitations as a bar. Held, at common law the statute of limitations did not operate on demand certificates of deposit until demand had been made, and section 70 of the Negotiable Instrument Law does not alter this common-law requirement. This applies also to certified checks, for they are substantially the same as …