Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Usury Trompe L'Oeil, James J. White
The Usury Trompe L'Oeil, James J. White
Articles
This Article demonstrates how the interaction of a federal statute passed in 1864,1 a case decided by the Supreme Court in 1978,2 and modem technology has legally debarred every state legislature from controlling consumer interest rates in its state-but not from passing laws that appear to do so-and has politically debarred the Congress from setting federal rates to replace the state rates. As a consequence, the elaborate usury laws on the books of most states are only a trompe l'oeil, a "visual deception... rendered in extremely fine detail ... ." The presence of these finely detailed laws gives the illusion …
Banks And Banking--Collections Of Out-Of-Town Items--Priorities On Insolvency Of Correspondent Bank
Banks And Banking--Collections Of Out-Of-Town Items--Priorities On Insolvency Of Correspondent Bank
Michigan Law Review
In settlement of an adverse balance on the day's clearings, D bank gave to plaintiff a draft on its metropolitan correspondent. D bank then became insolvent, and on presentment the drawee refused to pay, though D bank had sufficient funds on deposit to cover the draft. The receiver allowed plaintiff's claim as a general one. There was no indication that D knew it was insolvent at the time it issued the draft. Plaintiff then brought suit against the receiver to establish a preferred claim. Held, that the issuance of the draft created a trust fund, and plaintiff bank was …
Trusts -- Self-Dealing Of The Trustee -- Right To Look Through The Corporate Entity
Trusts -- Self-Dealing Of The Trustee -- Right To Look Through The Corporate Entity
Michigan Law Review
One Northrop was appointed by the court as guardian, receiving $2,500 which he deposited in defendant bank of which he was the president, the general manager, and of which he was in complete control. Subsequently he exchanged this deposit for a mortgage owned by the bank. The bank became insolvent, and plaintiff, as substituted trustee, brought this action to have a preference adjudged out of the bank's assets in favor of the ward. Held, plaintiff could ignore the mortgage transaction but could only claim as a general creditor of the bank. Ottawa Banking and Trust Co. v. Crookston State …
Banks And Banking - Statutory Liability Of Directors Of Insolvent Bank For Issuing Renewal Certificate Of Deposit
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff renewed certain certificates of deposit with the defendant bank. When each renewal was issued the bank was "unsafe or insolvent," and the directors knew or had good reason to know it to be so. This was not the situation when the original certificates were issued. The plaintiff based his right of recovery from the directors of the bank upon Gen. Stat. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) sec. 10407, which makes it a penal offense for the officers or directors of a bank to receive deposits knowing the bank is "unsafe or insolvent." Plaintiff recovered in the lower court. Held …
Bills And Notes-Checks-Right Against Drawer-Presentation For Payment Within Reasonable Time
Bills And Notes-Checks-Right Against Drawer-Presentation For Payment Within Reasonable Time
Michigan Law Review
Defendant delivered a check on an Austin bank to the plaintiff at his farm, seven and one-half miles from Austin. On the fourth business day following, plaintiff deposited the check to his account with another Austin bank. Before the latter could collect, the drawee bank failed. From the date of the check to the drawee's failure, defendant had sufficient funds on deposit to pay the check. The plaintiff, on the three business days after receipt of the check, stacked corn fodder. His home was located on a good gravel road leading to Austin; and he owned an automobile. Held, …
Bills And Notes-Discharge-What Is "Renunciation."
Bills And Notes-Discharge-What Is "Renunciation."
Michigan Law Review
The recent and interesting Minnesota case of McGlynn v. Granstrom again raises the question of the construction of certain sections of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Law. It is there held, that Sec. 122 of the N. I. L., requiring a "renunciation" to be in writing, does not apply to a discharge by accord and satisfaction.