Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Bills And Notes - Acceleration Clause As Affecting Negotiability
Bills And Notes - Acceleration Clause As Affecting Negotiability
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was sued on a note containing, among other acceleration clauses, a provision that if any holder deemed himself insecure at any time, the note should become immediately due and payable. Appealing from a summary judgment against him, the defendant contended that the instrument was nonnegotiable. Held, the acceleration provisions in the instrument did not destroy its negotiability. Dart National Bank v. Burton, 258 Mich. 283, 241 N. W. 858 (1932).
Banks And Banking - Preferred Claims Of Savings Depositors - Set-Offs
Banks And Banking - Preferred Claims Of Savings Depositors - Set-Offs
Michigan Law Review
Members of the Michigan bar who have had to deal with perplexing receivership problems, growing out of the many recent bank failures, should welcome the case of Reichert v. Farmers & Workingmens Savings Bank, 257 Mich. 500, decided April 4, 1932. It involves twelve important questions in banking law, certified from the Jackson circuit court. The answers of the supreme court to these questions should serve to settle the law for the benefit of receivers and their counsel for years to come.
Mortgages -Assignment In Good Faith After Maturity Cuts Off Prior Latent Equities
Mortgages -Assignment In Good Faith After Maturity Cuts Off Prior Latent Equities
Michigan Law Review
M executed a negotiable note payable to the order of P, secured by a mortgage. After maturity, P assigned the note and mortgage without his indorsement to X for value. Y procured an assignment of these from X by fraud and in turn assigned them to Z, a purchaser without notice and for value. In Z's suit to foreclose the mortgage, X intervened, demanding the delivery of the same to himself. Held, Z's bona fide purchase cut off X's latent equity. Frank v. Brown, 255 Mich. 415, 238 N. W. 237 (1931).
Trusts - Tracing Of Assets - Preference
Trusts - Tracing Of Assets - Preference
Michigan Law Review
Public funds were unlawfully deposited in the insolvent bank. At the time the bank closed the cash in its own vault was less than the amount of public funds deposited but it did have, at the time of closing and at all times before, deposits in correspondent banks which, taken with the cash in its own vault, exceeded the amount of the public funds unlawfully deposited. Held, that the unlawful deposit of the public funds, the bank knowing them to be public funds, created a trust of those funds in the hands of the bank, which trust was impressed …
Suretyship - Revocation By Death
Suretyship - Revocation By Death
Michigan Law Review
In consideration of a promise on the part of the vendor in a land contract to accept from the purchaser the first four installments of interest in the form of four notes, the decedent agreed in writing to indorse said notes and become responsible to the vendor for their payment. The surety died before the first of the notes was to be made and indorsed. A claim was made against the estate of the surety on this writing, the trial judge finding for the estate on the ground that there was no competent evidence from which damage might be determined; …
Bills And Notes-Payee Of Note Is Holder In Due Course Unless Contrary Appears
Bills And Notes-Payee Of Note Is Holder In Due Course Unless Contrary Appears
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, who had jointly signed (ostensibly as maker) a note containing the words, "I promise to pay," was held not entitled to show by parol evidence that he was an accommodation indorser, under 2 MICH. COMP. LAWS 1929, secs. 9249, 9266 (N. I. L., sec. 17), and 9309 (N. I. L., sec. 60), the court saying, by way of dictum, that, in the absence of a contrary showing, the payee named in a promissory note payable to order is a holder in due course. Price v. Klett (Mich. 1931) 238 N.W. 253.