Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Bills And Notes - What Constitutes A Reasonable Time In Presenting A Check For Payment
Bills And Notes - What Constitutes A Reasonable Time In Presenting A Check For Payment
Michigan Law Review
Defendant delivered to the plaintiff, at about 10 o'clock A. M., a check drawn on the B bank. The next morning at 10:30 o'clock the plaintiff's agent went to drawee to cash the check. As there was "a run" being made on the bank that day, the agent was forced to stand in line. After waiting from 10:30 o'clock in the morning to 1 o'clock in the afternoon, he left without cashing the check. The next day the bank failed to open its doors. In an action by the plaintiff to recover the debt covered by the check, the defendant …
Trusts - Tracing Of Assets - Preference
Trusts - Tracing Of Assets - Preference
Michigan Law Review
Public funds were unlawfully deposited in the insolvent bank. At the time the bank closed the cash in its own vault was less than the amount of public funds deposited but it did have, at the time of closing and at all times before, deposits in correspondent banks which, taken with the cash in its own vault, exceeded the amount of the public funds unlawfully deposited. Held, that the unlawful deposit of the public funds, the bank knowing them to be public funds, created a trust of those funds in the hands of the bank, which trust was impressed …
Trusts -- Self-Dealing Of The Trustee -- Right To Look Through The Corporate Entity
Trusts -- Self-Dealing Of The Trustee -- Right To Look Through The Corporate Entity
Michigan Law Review
One Northrop was appointed by the court as guardian, receiving $2,500 which he deposited in defendant bank of which he was the president, the general manager, and of which he was in complete control. Subsequently he exchanged this deposit for a mortgage owned by the bank. The bank became insolvent, and plaintiff, as substituted trustee, brought this action to have a preference adjudged out of the bank's assets in favor of the ward. Held, plaintiff could ignore the mortgage transaction but could only claim as a general creditor of the bank. Ottawa Banking and Trust Co. v. Crookston State …