Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Banking and Finance Law

University of Michigan Law School

1932

Fraud

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Bills And Notes-Holders In Due Course-Good Faith Taker Apr 1932

Bills And Notes-Holders In Due Course-Good Faith Taker

Michigan Law Review

The plaintiff bank sued the defendant maker on his promissory note which with several others had been given as collateral by the payees for a loan made to them by the bank. The defendant alleged fraud and that the bank did not take in good faith as required by the Uniform Negotiable Act, Gen. Laws 2921 (N. I. L., sec. 52) because of the following circumstances: inconsistent property valuation reports, knowledge of the slight financial responsibility of one of the makers of the note, insufficient investigation of financial status of one of the guarantors and the lack of a financial …


Bills And Notes - Is One Assuming Liabilities To The Creditors Of His Transferor A Holder In Due Course Feb 1932

Bills And Notes - Is One Assuming Liabilities To The Creditors Of His Transferor A Holder In Due Course

Michigan Law Review

The plaintiff entered into an agreement whereby it was to receive all the assets of an insolvent bank as consideration for the assumption of certain specified liabilities. Among the assets was a note upon which the plaintiff is now suing a prior indorser. Although it was the intention of the defendant to indorse as agent in accordance with the request of the insolvent bank, on the face of his endorsement he indorsed individually. Held, that since the plaintiff was not a holder in due course, the note was subject to the same defenses in the hands of the plaintiff …