Law Commons^™

Blocking Payment On A Certified, Cashier's, Or Bank Check, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

When disputes arise between buyers and sellers over completed commercial transactions and payment has been delivered to the seller in the form of a negotiable instrument, a dissatisfied buyer may seek to suspend the instrument's payment obligation. By blocking payment the buyer strengthens his bargaining position and prevents the seller from dissipating the proceeds of the sale before the buyer can establish the merit of his claim. Blocking payment forces the seller to enforce the commercial agreement through court action or satisfy the buyer's grievances.

Promissory Notes In The Legislations Of The Americas, Juan Octavio Díaz Lewis

Michigan Law Review

It has rightly been said that the promissory note is the Cinderella of negotiable paper. It is indeed strange that this instrument, widely used in most countries, is accorded only a few words in the legal textbooks and a few sections in the respective statutes. The purpose of the present study is not to rescue promissory notes from their present position of obscurity, but rather to present a unified classification of the specific provisions relating thereto, which are in force at the present time in the legislations of the American continent.

Acceptance By Intervention In Bills Of Exchange, Salvador Ltriago

Michigan Law Review

Intervention is an act whereby a person becomes a party to a negotiable instrument, whether by accepting the bill or by paying the sum indicated thereon, in order to relieve one of the obligors on the bill from the action of recourse that the holder could assert against him in consequence of default of acceptance or payment by the drawee.

The complexity of the material to be discussed renders it necessary, in order to clarify the development of the exposition, for us to advance several concepts, which will later be considered more fully at the proper places.

Trusts-Participation By Banks In Diversion Of Trust Funds

Michigan Law Review

That fiduciaries who misappropriate or divert trust funds from their proper purpose are bound to make good is familiar doctrine. It is equally clear that those who guiltily participate in such. diversions by faithless fiduciaries are also liable. The point of chief difficulty is the determination of what participations are properly classified as guilty, for innocent participators clearly are not bound to make good. For example, a fiduciary with power to sell things held in trust may wish to turn the subject matter into cash preliminary to a misappropriation. A bona fide purchaser who provides the cash no doubt stands …

Bills And Notes-Alteration By Collateral Written Agreement

Michigan Law Review

Defendant was accommodation indorser on two of four notes executed at the same time with different maturity dates. As part of the same transaction, but unknown to the defendant, the maker, two other indorsers, and the payee, plaintiff in the cause, entered into an agreement in writing whereby the maturity of the unpaid notes would be accelerated on default as to any due. Held, in, an action on the notes, that instruments simultaneously executed and referring to the same subject matter are to be construed together, and the effect of such integration here was to bring about an alteration …

Banks And Banking - Land Contract As Item For Collection Under The Bank Collection Code

Michigan Law Review

The petitioner deposited with A Bank a land contract. The bank was to collect payments thereon and remit them to the petitioner. After making two collections amounting to $100, the bank became insolvent and the petitioner sought a preferred claim against all the assets of the bank. The Bank Collection Code (sec. 13 of Act No. 240 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931) was the basis of his claim. The trial judge allowed him a preference as to cash assets on hand at the time the receiver took possession. Since it was doubtful whether there would be any cash …

Mortgages -Assignment In Good Faith After Maturity Cuts Off Prior Latent Equities

Michigan Law Review

M executed a negotiable note payable to the order of P, secured by a mortgage. After maturity, P assigned the note and mortgage without his indorsement to X for value. Y procured an assignment of these from X by fraud and in turn assigned them to Z, a purchaser without notice and for value. In Z's suit to foreclose the mortgage, X intervened, demanding the delivery of the same to himself. Held, Z's bona fide purchase cut off X's latent equity. Frank v. Brown, 255 Mich. 415, 238 N. W. 237 (1931).

Bills And Notes-Negotiability Of Corporate Debentures

Michigan Law Review

Many corporate bonds and debentures contain some such reference provision as the following: "* * * all [bonds, debentures] issued under a certain Trust Agreement, dated as of June 15, 1926, executed by the Company to the National City Bank of New York, as Trustee, to which Trust Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms under which the said Debentures are issued and the rights and obligations of the Company, of the Trustee and of the respective holders of the said Debentures under said Trust Agreement. * * *." To this clause some of these securities …

Conditions In Bills And Notes, Ralph W. Aigler

Michigan Law Review

Remembering that at least the early use of negotiable instruments was very largely as a substitute for money in making payments and exchanges of credit generally, it is not surprising that it should have been deemed a prime requirement of such documents that they should be unconditional in their orders and promises. Uncertainties as to the responsibility of parties are no doubt inevitable, but the element of chance may be eliminated at least as to the content of the instrument. The usefulness of commercial paper would be seriously impaired if business men and others proposing to take such instruments in …

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.

Form Of The General Acceptance, F Thulin

Michigan Law Review

Of the various subdivisions of the law of commercial paper, the form of the acceptance is one that in a way has had the most diversified history. Furthermore, from its very nature, and from the fact that the law merchant was very seldom touched by statute, and from the fact that the common law attached no particular significance toa writing (except as to writings under seal and as to writings required by the Statute of Frauds), the form of the acceptance was possible of a rather elaborate analysis.