Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Advanced Health-Care Services v. Radford Community Hospital (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Associated General Contractors v. California State Council of Carpenters (1)
- Brager & Co. v. Leumi Securities Corp. (1)
- Continental TV v. GTE Sylvania (1)
-
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. (1)
- FTC (1)
- Federal Trade Commission (1)
- Giben America v. Schelling America (1)
- Levine v. McLeskey (1)
- MDK v. Mike's Train House (1)
- Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. (1)
- Monsanto v. Spray-Ritte Service Corp. (1)
- New York v. Hendrickson Bros. (1)
- Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital (1)
- PGA (1)
- Pocahontas Supreme Coal Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. (1)
- Professional Golfers' Association (1)
- Seabury Management v. Professional Golfers' Ass'n of America (1)
- Sherman Act (1)
- Supermarket of Marlinton v. Meadow Gold Dairies (1)
- Tempkin v. Lewis-Gale Clinic (1)
- The Daily Progress (1)
- The Dead Hand Loses its Grip in Virginia: A New Rule for Trust Amendment and Termination? (1)
- Thompson Everett v. National Cable Advertising (1)
- United States v. Clarke (1)
- West Virginia ex. res McGraw v. Meadow Gold Dairies (1)
- Worrell Enterprises v. Real Estate III (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Antitrust And Trade Regulation, Michael F. Urbanski, Francis H. Casola
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Antitrust And Trade Regulation, Michael F. Urbanski, Francis H. Casola
University of Richmond Law Review
Group boycott and antitrust conspiracy claims met with little success in Virginia this year. Both federal and state courts are increasingly wary of allowing cases to proceed where the essential elements of antitrust claims are not established or where no impact on competition is proven. Moreover, procedural and evidentiary difficulties have plagued antitrust plaintiffs this year. In short, the cases reflect judicial analysis that is both sophisticated and resistant to allowing meritless antitrust claims to get to a jury.