Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Clayton Act (4)
- Competition (2)
- Monopoly (2)
- Price fixing (2)
- American Photocopy Equip. Co. v. Rovico (1)
-
- Cartel (1)
- Cause of action (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Discriminatory royalty rate (1)
- Federal Trade Commission (1)
- General Venue Statute (1)
- Great Depression (1)
- Identity of matters (1)
- Individualism (1)
- Invention (1)
- LaPeyre v. FTC (1)
- Laissez faire (1)
- Licensing right (1)
- Mergers (1)
- National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 (1)
- New Deal (1)
- Party scope (1)
- Patent grant (1)
- Private plaintiff (1)
- Restraint of trade (1)
- Robinson-Patman Act (1)
- Section 12 (1)
- Section 5(b) (1)
- Self-exploitation standard (1)
- Sherman Act (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Antitrust's Newest Quagmire: The Noerr-Pennington Defense, L. Barry Costilo
Antitrust's Newest Quagmire: The Noerr-Pennington Defense, L. Barry Costilo
Michigan Law Review
In recent years two relatively unheralded but sweeping antitrust decisions by the Supreme Court have given rise to ramifications far beyond their facts. Unless limited, they may be interpreted by business planners as providing safe havens in many areas of conduct where corporations and trade associations have previously feared to tread. The cases are Eastern Railroad Presidents Corp. v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. and United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington. The broad issue they raise is the extent to which business can concertedly seek to use the mechanism of government for the purpose of restraining trade without violating …
The Ftc's Power To Seek Preliminary Injunctions In Anti-Merger Cases, James H. Cohen
The Ftc's Power To Seek Preliminary Injunctions In Anti-Merger Cases, James H. Cohen
Michigan Law Review
This Comment will examine the bases and the implications of the Supreme Court's holding. It will point out a number of problems raised by granting the FTC this remedial power, and will suggest that the situations in which preliminary injunctions may be obtained from a court of appeals should be strictly limited.
Antitrust-Patents-Licenses-Regulation Of Patent License Royalty Rates Under The Antitrust Laws, Michigan Law Review
Antitrust-Patents-Licenses-Regulation Of Patent License Royalty Rates Under The Antitrust Laws, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Neither the Constitution nor federal legislation defines a patentee's licensing rights; consequently, it has devolved upon the courts to control patent marketing practices. A patentee is entitled to a limited monopoly on his invention, and proper use of this grant is not a violation of any law regulating trade practices. Yet licensing affords an opportunity to enlarge the scope of this monopoly, and courts using various rationales have declared illegal different forms of patent licensing arrangements found to be outside the protective coverage of the patent grant. Until recently, however, the courts have not dealt with the problem of whether …
Antitrust-Limitation Of Actions-Clayton Act Statute Of Limitations Tolled On Treble Damage Suits Against Non-Government Defendant Co-Conspirators-- Michigan V. Morton Salt Co., Michigan Law Review
Antitrust-Limitation Of Actions-Clayton Act Statute Of Limitations Tolled On Treble Damage Suits Against Non-Government Defendant Co-Conspirators-- Michigan V. Morton Salt Co., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs, several states and smaller governmental units, filed related antitrust treble damage claims against ten rock salt companies that had allegedly conspired to fix prices. These private actions were instituted subsequent to civil and criminal antitrust proceedings brought by the federal government in which four of the ten companies had been named as defendants and five designated as co-conspirators but not prosecuted. Section 5(b) of the Clayton Act provides that when such actions are brought by the government, "the running of the statute of limitations in respect of every private right of action arising under said laws and based in …
Hawley: The New Deal And The Monopoly Problem, Arthur D. Austin
Hawley: The New Deal And The Monopoly Problem, Arthur D. Austin
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The New Deal and the Monopoly Problem By E. W. Hawley
Antitrust-Venue-Time Of Venue Under Section 12 Of The Clayton Act Refers To Time When Action Accrued-Eastland Construction Co. V. Keasbey & Mattison Co., Michigan Law Review
Antitrust-Venue-Time Of Venue Under Section 12 Of The Clayton Act Refers To Time When Action Accrued-Eastland Construction Co. V. Keasbey & Mattison Co., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In 1964, plaintiff brought a treble damage suit under the Clayton Act in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that defendant had violated the antitrust laws while doing business in that district. Defendant, a Pennsylvania corporation which formerly had conducted a portion of its business in California but which had ceased all activities there in 1962, moved for dismissal, arguing that venue was improper because it was not transacting business in the Northern District of California at the time suit was instituted. On appeal from a ruling by the district court granting the motion for …